---
title: "T_128, full record | Crucible Year"
url: https://peteryuill.art/archive/works/T_128
description: "Crucible Year: a continuous year of sumi ink painting on paper by Peter Yuill, begun 29 December 2025."
source: generated from the Crucible Year master database
---

Archive · full record

# T_128

[The work as shown](https://peteryuill.art/works/T_128). Every value below comes from vae.db, the master database of the Crucible Year.

## Recorded

- **Date:** 2026.03.22, day 84
- **Size:** 70 × 140 cm
- **Paper:** S6, Qing Yi half-raw
- **Inks:** MB1, MB2, MB3
- **Phase:** P1 Warm-up

- **Shown on the site:** yes (V23 rating of 5.0 or higher)

- **Early storage triage:** SA: save, archive (Peter's early system, since retired)

## Measured · V23 (v23.8)

- **V23 rating:** 6
- **Form:** 2
- **Tonal depth:** 2
- **Layering:** 2.2
- **Composition:** 2
- **Material and surface:** 2
- **Ink cover:** 71%
- **Dark share:** 44%
- **Tonal steps:** 6

- **Flaws named by the reads:** other 8, water stain 4

The V23 rating runs from 1 to 9, with 5 the middle of this body of work. It is the engine's reading, and the reference the archive is measured against.

## Peter's own rating

- **Rating:** 5

Peter's rating is his own eye, not the engine's, and he never gives a 10.

> “There is always something that can be done better.”

Peter Yuill · 2026.07.02

## Older engine

- **V7:** 8

From an earlier engine (V7). Its scale differs from V23's, so it is only ever compared with other readings by the same engine.

## How the number was made

Read by the Visual Analysis Engine, version 23.8, on 2026.10.06: measured by code, then read 5 times by Claude Opus 5.5 against three reference paintings (R1 to R3), each read independent of the others. [How the engine works](https://peteryuill.art/method).

WHAT THE CODE SEES

## Three views of one sheet.

Left, the photograph. Centre, the tone stretch the model is shown beside it: the darkest 45% of tones spread over the whole range, so flat black, banding and stains show. Right, every pixel as the measuring code classes it: cyan black ink, deep teal translucent grey, stone the palest ink, near black bare paper.

![T_128]

![T_128, tone-stretched]

![T_128, classed by brightness]

71% of the sheet carries ink

TONAL STEPS

## 6 families of tone.

Every inked pixel's brightness in 64 bins, smoothed; each circled peak holds at least 4% of the ink. Life inside the black: 0.060 (under 0.045 reads as flat).

FIVE READS

## Five reads, agreeing on 4 of 5 qualities.

Each quality placed on its ladder by each read, and the mean the engine keeps. Where reads differ, they differ by one rung; close calls resolve down.

READ 1 READ 2 READ 3 READ 4 READ 5 MEAN

Form 2 BUILT 2 BUILT 2 BUILT 2 BUILT 2 BUILT 2.0

Tonal depth 2 MODELLED 2 MODELLED 2 MODELLED 2 MODELLED 2 MODELLED 2.0

Layering 3 ORDERED 2 LEGIBLE 2 LEGIBLE 2 LEGIBLE 2 LEGIBLE 2.2

Composition 2 WORKING 2 WORKING 2 WORKING 2 WORKING 2 WORKING 2.0

Material and surface 2 SOUND 2 SOUND 2 SOUND 2 SOUND 2 SOUND 2.0

### READ 1, IN ITS OWN WORDS

“An energetic sheet like R2. The translucent rectangles are legibly layered and a fluent arc leads the eye, but the dark wedges are bulky and flat and the bottom right is crowded. The surface has minor creases and mottling.”

Form · BUILT

Left arc stroke tapers fluently to its hooked point; the right black bar and bottom dark wedges are bulky, slab-like fills with stiff rectangular ends.

WEAKEST Blunt dark slab bottom centre-left, filled-in wedge

STRONGEST Curved hooked stroke sweeping left to centre

Tonal depth · MODELLED

Grey slabs show grain and graded density, and the top-right mass bands well; the bottom black wedges stay mostly uniform inside. Modulation 0.060 with six tonal steps.

WEAKEST Bottom dark masses largely flat inside

STRONGEST Right grey mass with graded vertical banding

Layering · ORDERED

Pale slabs, then mid-grey rectangles, then black strokes and spatter. Overlaps stay translucent and you can read the order across the centre and right.

WEAKEST Bottom-right overlaps thicken toward heavy dark

STRONGEST Translucent grey rectangles stacked under black strokes

Composition · WORKING

Diagonal flow from the left arc through spatter into the right masses; the open top-left paper is shaped by the spray. Bottom right is jammed with stacked blocks.

WEAKEST Crowded bottom-right cluster of overlapping slabs

STRONGEST Diagonal arc carrying eye from left to right

Material and surface · SOUND

Ink is controlled and spatter is deliberate. Crease lines run through the lower-left greys and there is mild cloudy mottling in the top-right wash, both minor.

WEAKEST Cloudy mottling inside top-right grey mass

STRONGEST Dry-brush spatter and grainy grey wash edges

FLAWS

## 5 distinct places, 0 major.

Each read must name every flaw and where it is, in a ninth of the sheet. Here the reads named flaws in 5 distinct places, 12 mentions in all across 5 reads; the number in each ninth is how many times a flaw was named there. Reads agreeing on a place strengthen the evidence for one flaw; they do not multiply it.

GEOMETRY

## Measured from the 16-bit master.

The previous engine (V22) measured this sheet's master file: 1 principal ink mass traced (cyan), 5 enclosed voids at true size in their grid cells (amber), the main gesture from start to end (red). Of 14 edge segments, 29% crisp, 43% soft or bloomed, 29% broken.

RULE 1 Two tonal steps or fewer

Tonal depth held at rung 1. 6 steps: not applied

RULE 2 A major flaw

Material held at rung 1. Mild waves in the unmounted paper are never a flaw. none named

RULE 3 Any quality below 0.5

The rating cannot exceed 4. lowest 2.0

RULE 4 At least two valid reads

A read that breaks the reply format is discarded. 5 of 5 valid

THE ARITHMETIC

## V23 rating 6.0.

Engine v23.8, 5 reads. Fixed arithmetic, the same for every painting; the constants were set on 24 randomly chosen paintings so the median sheet scores 5. The scale is relative to this archive, not to painting in general, and a difference of less than half a point between two paintings is noise.

MEAN RUNG 2.04 (2.0 + 2.0 + 2.2 + 2.0 + 2.0) ÷ 5
→

RAW 5.08 1 + 2 × 2.04
→

RATING 6.0 5 + 2.086 × (5.08 − 4.60)

## Where next

[Every record the full archive](https://peteryuill.art/archive)[2026.03.22 every painting from this date](https://peteryuill.art/days/2026-03-22)
