---
title: "T_197, full record | Crucible Year"
url: https://peteryuill.art/archive/works/T_197
description: "Crucible Year: a continuous year of sumi ink painting on paper by Peter Yuill, begun 29 December 2025."
source: generated from the Crucible Year master database
---

Archive · full record

# T_197

[The work as shown](https://peteryuill.art/works/T_197). Every value below comes from vae.db, the master database of the Crucible Year.

## Recorded

- **Date:** 2026.04.08, day 101
- **Size:** 97 × 180 cm
- **Paper:** S11, Red Star Mo She Special Effect Xieyi, raw
- **Inks:** MB1, MB2, MB3
- **Phase:** P1 Warm-up

- **Shown on the site:** yes (V23 rating of 5.0 or higher)

- **Early storage triage:** SA: save, archive (Peter's early system, since retired)

## Measured · V23 (v23.8)

- **V23 rating:** 5.5
- **Form:** 2
- **Tonal depth:** 2
- **Layering:** 2
- **Composition:** 2
- **Material and surface:** 1.6
- **Ink cover:** 52%
- **Dark share:** 34%
- **Tonal steps:** 3

- **Flaws named by the reads:** bloom 5, other 5, water stain 3, tide line 1

The V23 rating runs from 1 to 9, with 5 the middle of this body of work. It is the engine's reading, and the reference the archive is measured against.

## Peter's own rating

- **Rating:** 6

Peter's rating is his own eye, not the engine's, and he never gives a 10.

> “There is always something that can be done better.”

Peter Yuill · 2026.07.02

## Older engine

- **V7:** 6

From an earlier engine (V7). Its scale differs from V23's, so it is only ever compared with other readings by the same engine.

## How the number was made

Read by the Visual Analysis Engine, version 23.8, on 2026.10.06: measured by code, then read 5 times by Claude Opus 5.5 against three reference paintings (R1 to R3), each read independent of the others. [How the engine works](https://peteryuill.art/method).

WHAT THE CODE SEES

## Three views of one sheet.

Left, the photograph. Centre, the tone stretch the model is shown beside it: the darkest 45% of tones spread over the whole range, so flat black, banding and stains show. Right, every pixel as the measuring code classes it: cyan black ink, deep teal translucent grey, stone the palest ink, near black bare paper.

![T_197]

![T_197, tone-stretched]

![T_197, classed by brightness]

52% of the sheet carries ink

TONAL STEPS

## 3 families of tone.

Every inked pixel's brightness in 64 bins, smoothed; each circled peak holds at least 4% of the ink. Life inside the black: 0.051 (under 0.045 reads as flat).

FIVE READS

## Five reads, agreeing on 4 of 5 qualities.

Each quality placed on its ladder by each read, and the mean the engine keeps. Where reads differ, they differ by one rung; close calls resolve down.

READ 1 READ 2 READ 3 READ 4 READ 5 MEAN

Form 2 BUILT 2 BUILT 2 BUILT 2 BUILT 2 BUILT 2.0

Tonal depth 2 MODELLED 2 MODELLED 2 MODELLED 2 MODELLED 2 MODELLED 2.0

Layering 2 LEGIBLE 2 LEGIBLE 2 LEGIBLE 2 LEGIBLE 2 LEGIBLE 2.0

Composition 2 WORKING 2 WORKING 2 WORKING 2 WORKING 2 WORKING 2.0

Material and surface 2 SOUND 1 FLAWED 2 SOUND 2 SOUND 1 FLAWED 1.6

### READ 1, IN ITS OWN WORDS

“This is an ordinary, energetic sheet with a strong rising diagonal and a fluent wedge. A bulky lower dark mass, a cloudy mottled right panel with soft blooms, and loose spatter keep every ladder at a working average.”

Form · BUILT

Upper-left wedge tapers fluently; the long curved boat-form holds its walls but the lower-left mass is slab-like, and the right grey panel's edges dissolve into drips.

WEAKEST Bulky lower-left dark slab with ragged blunt end

STRONGEST Tapering dark wedge at upper left

Tonal depth · MODELLED

Dark lower mass shows horizontal streaks and banding; the central arc has bristle grain; right panel is a mid-grey mottle without real range. Modulation 0.051, just above flat.

WEAKEST Mottled right grey panel reads cloudy, little depth

STRONGEST Dry-brush streaked grey arc sweeping centre

Layering · LEGIBLE

Black boat-form and wedge read clearly over and beside the grey sweeping arc; about two to three passes, legible where they meet, without a built sequence across the sheet.

WEAKEST Right panel's dark blots sit ambiguously in grey

STRONGEST Dark boat-form over translucent grey arc, centre

Composition · WORKING

A clear rising movement carries the eye from the dark lower left up through the arc; top-left paper is shaped, but lower-right drops and the right panel feel loose.

WEAKEST Scattered spatter and drips in the lower right

STRONGEST Rising diagonal sweep from lower left to upper right

Material and surface · SOUND

Ink is controlled in the dark masses and the dry-brush arc; the right panel has reticulated mottling and two soft dark blooms, though these sit away from the principal black mass.

WEAKEST Dark blooms inside the right grey panel

STRONGEST Dry-brush grain in the central arc

FLAWS

## 3 distinct places, 1 major.

Each read must name every flaw and where it is, in a ninth of the sheet. Here the reads named flaws in 3 distinct places, 14 mentions in all across 5 reads; the number in each ninth is how many times a flaw was named there. Reads agreeing on a place strengthen the evidence for one flaw; they do not multiply it. A major flaw holds Material and surface at rung 1.

GEOMETRY

## Measured from the 16-bit master.

The previous engine (V22) measured this sheet's master file: 4 principal ink masses traced (cyan), 7 enclosed voids at true size in their grid cells (amber), the main gesture from start to end (red). Of 18 edge segments, 56% crisp, 0% soft or bloomed, 44% broken.

RULE 1 Two tonal steps or fewer

Tonal depth held at rung 1. 3 steps: not applied

RULE 2 A major flaw

Material held at rung 1. Mild waves in the unmounted paper are never a flaw. 2 major flaws: applied

RULE 3 Any quality below 0.5

The rating cannot exceed 4. lowest 1.6

RULE 4 At least two valid reads

A read that breaks the reply format is discarded. 5 of 5 valid

THE ARITHMETIC

## V23 rating 5.5.

Engine v23.8, 5 reads. Fixed arithmetic, the same for every painting; the constants were set on 24 randomly chosen paintings so the median sheet scores 5. The scale is relative to this archive, not to painting in general, and a difference of less than half a point between two paintings is noise.

MEAN RUNG 1.92 (2.0 + 2.0 + 2.0 + 2.0 + 1.6) ÷ 5
→

RAW 4.84 1 + 2 × 1.92
→

RATING 5.5 5 + 2.086 × (4.84 − 4.60)

## Where next

[Every record the full archive](https://peteryuill.art/archive)[2026.04.08 every painting from this date](https://peteryuill.art/days/2026-04-08)
