---
title: "T_198, full record | Crucible Year"
url: https://peteryuill.art/archive/works/T_198
description: "Crucible Year: a continuous year of sumi ink painting on paper by Peter Yuill, begun 29 December 2025."
source: generated from the Crucible Year master database
---

Archive · full record

# T_198

[The work as shown](https://peteryuill.art/works/T_198). Every value below comes from vae.db, the master database of the Crucible Year.

## Recorded

- **Date:** 2026.04.08, day 101
- **Size:** 97 × 180 cm
- **Paper:** S11, Red Star Mo She Special Effect Xieyi, raw
- **Inks:** MB1, MB2, MB3
- **Phase:** P1 Warm-up

- **Shown on the site:** yes (V23 rating of 5.0 or higher)

- **Early storage triage:** SA: save, archive (Peter's early system, since retired)

## Measured · V23 (v23.8)

- **V23 rating:** 5.3
- **Form:** 2
- **Tonal depth:** 2
- **Layering:** 2
- **Composition:** 2
- **Material and surface:** 1.4
- **Ink cover:** 57%
- **Dark share:** 18%
- **Tonal steps:** 4

- **Flaws named by the reads:** other 10, bloom 3

The V23 rating runs from 1 to 9, with 5 the middle of this body of work. It is the engine's reading, and the reference the archive is measured against.

## Older engine

- **V7:** 5

From an earlier engine (V7). Its scale differs from V23's, so it is only ever compared with other readings by the same engine.

## How the number was made

Read by the Visual Analysis Engine, version 23.8, on 2026.10.06: measured by code, then read 5 times by Claude Opus 5.5 against three reference paintings (R1 to R3), each read independent of the others. [How the engine works](https://peteryuill.art/method).

WHAT THE CODE SEES

## Three views of one sheet.

Left, the photograph. Centre, the tone stretch the model is shown beside it: the darkest 45% of tones spread over the whole range, so flat black, banding and stains show. Right, every pixel as the measuring code classes it: cyan black ink, deep teal translucent grey, stone the palest ink, near black bare paper.

![T_198]

![T_198, tone-stretched]

![T_198, classed by brightness]

57% of the sheet carries ink

TONAL STEPS

## 4 families of tone.

Every inked pixel's brightness in 64 bins, smoothed; each circled peak holds at least 4% of the ink. Life inside the black: 0.048 (under 0.045 reads as flat).

FIVE READS

## Five reads, agreeing on 4 of 5 qualities.

Each quality placed on its ladder by each read, and the mean the engine keeps. Where reads differ, they differ by one rung; close calls resolve down.

READ 1 READ 2 READ 3 READ 4 READ 5 MEAN

Form 2 BUILT 2 BUILT 2 BUILT 2 BUILT 2 BUILT 2.0

Tonal depth 2 MODELLED 2 MODELLED 2 MODELLED 2 MODELLED 2 MODELLED 2.0

Layering 2 LEGIBLE 2 LEGIBLE 2 LEGIBLE 2 LEGIBLE 2 LEGIBLE 2.0

Composition 2 WORKING 2 WORKING 2 WORKING 2 WORKING 2 WORKING 2.0

Material and surface 2 SOUND 1 FLAWED 2 SOUND 1 FLAWED 1 FLAWED 1.4

### READ 1, IN ITS OWN WORDS

“This is a gestural sheet like R2. It has a strong left column, a textured grey sweep in the centre, and lumpy dark blots. The empty paper at the lower right is unshaped. It is ordinary across all five ladders.”

Form · BUILT

Left dark column holds with a coherent tapering tail; the central grey sweep is textured but loose; the top-right dark mass and lower-centre blot are lumpy and blob-like.

WEAKEST Top-right dark blob, lumpy with hole, blob-like

STRONGEST Left vertical dark stroke with tapering drip trail

Tonal depth · MODELLED

Central grey mass is richly grained with crinkle lines; left dark column shows some soft grading; dark modulation is 0.048, barely above flat; the top-right blob is mostly uniform.

WEAKEST Top-right dark blob fairly flat inside

STRONGEST Central grey sweep with streaked grain and ridges

Layering · LEGIBLE

Pale grey diagonal sweeps sit under the darker strokes and stay readable, with about two or three passes; the dark blots simply sit on top without building depth.

WEAKEST Dark blobs sit on top, little interplay

STRONGEST Grey diagonal washes crossing beneath left column

Composition · WORKING

Ink mass rises from left to upper right with outward spatter, which gives the sheet direction; the lower right third is empty and unshaped, and the scattered blots weaken the focus.

WEAKEST Bottom-right empty paper is leftover

STRONGEST Diagonal sweep from left column to upper right

Material and surface · SOUND

Dry-brush texture is used in the centre; paper creases cut through the grey mass; there is a bleached hole in the top-right blob; the spatter appears intended; no tide lines are visible.

WEAKEST Crinkle/crease lines through central grey mass

STRONGEST Dry-brush streaking in the central grey sweep

FLAWS

## 4 distinct places, 1 major.

Each read must name every flaw and where it is, in a ninth of the sheet. Here the reads named flaws in 4 distinct places, 13 mentions in all across 5 reads; the number in each ninth is how many times a flaw was named there. Reads agreeing on a place strengthen the evidence for one flaw; they do not multiply it. A major flaw holds Material and surface at rung 1.

GEOMETRY

## Measured from the 16-bit master.

The previous engine (V22) measured this sheet's master file: 2 principal ink masses traced (cyan), 5 enclosed voids at true size in their grid cells (amber), the main gesture from start to end (red). Of 15 edge segments, 53% crisp, 13% soft or bloomed, 33% broken.

RULE 1 Two tonal steps or fewer

Tonal depth held at rung 1. 4 steps: not applied

RULE 2 A major flaw

Material held at rung 1. Mild waves in the unmounted paper are never a flaw. 3 major flaws: applied

RULE 3 Any quality below 0.5

The rating cannot exceed 4. lowest 1.4

RULE 4 At least two valid reads

A read that breaks the reply format is discarded. 5 of 5 valid

THE ARITHMETIC

## V23 rating 5.3.

Engine v23.8, 5 reads. Fixed arithmetic, the same for every painting; the constants were set on 24 randomly chosen paintings so the median sheet scores 5. The scale is relative to this archive, not to painting in general, and a difference of less than half a point between two paintings is noise.

MEAN RUNG 1.88 (2.0 + 2.0 + 2.0 + 2.0 + 1.4) ÷ 5
→

RAW 4.76 1 + 2 × 1.88
→

RATING 5.3 5 + 2.086 × (4.76 − 4.60)

## Where next

[Every record the full archive](https://peteryuill.art/archive)[2026.04.08 every painting from this date](https://peteryuill.art/days/2026-04-08)
