---
title: "T_302, full record | Crucible Year"
url: https://peteryuill.art/archive/works/T_302
description: "Crucible Year: a continuous year of sumi ink painting on paper by Peter Yuill, begun 29 December 2025."
source: generated from the Crucible Year master database
---

Archive · full record

# T_302

[The work as shown](https://peteryuill.art/works/T_302). Every value below comes from vae.db, the master database of the Crucible Year.

## Recorded

- **Date:** 2026.05.14, day 137
- **Size:** 70 × 180 cm
- **Paper:** S3, Tanxi Jing Pi, raw
- **Inks:** MB4, MB5, MB6
- **Phase:** P2 The Switch

- **Shown on the site:** yes (V23 rating of 5.0 or higher)

- **Early storage triage:** SA: save, archive (Peter's early system, since retired)

## Measured · V23 (v23.8)

- **V23 rating:** 5.3
- **Form:** 2
- **Tonal depth:** 2
- **Layering:** 2
- **Composition:** 2
- **Material and surface:** 1.4
- **Ink cover:** 70%
- **Dark share:** 22%
- **Tonal steps:** 6

- **Flaws named by the reads:** ring 6, bloom 3, tide line 3, water stain 2

The V23 rating runs from 1 to 9, with 5 the middle of this body of work. It is the engine's reading, and the reference the archive is measured against.

## Peter's own rating

- **Rating:** 5

Peter's rating is his own eye, not the engine's, and he never gives a 10.

> “There is always something that can be done better.”

Peter Yuill · 2026.07.02

## Older engine

- **V7:** 7

From an earlier engine (V7). Its scale differs from V23's, so it is only ever compared with other readings by the same engine.

## How the number was made

Read by the Visual Analysis Engine, version 23.8, on 2026.10.06: measured by code, then read 5 times by Claude Opus 5.5 against three reference paintings (R1 to R3), each read independent of the others. [How the engine works](https://peteryuill.art/method).

WHAT THE CODE SEES

## Three views of one sheet.

Left, the photograph. Centre, the tone stretch the model is shown beside it: the darkest 45% of tones spread over the whole range, so flat black, banding and stains show. Right, every pixel as the measuring code classes it: cyan black ink, deep teal translucent grey, stone the palest ink, near black bare paper.

![T_302]

![T_302, tone-stretched]

![T_302, classed by brightness]

70% of the sheet carries ink

TONAL STEPS

## 6 families of tone.

Every inked pixel's brightness in 64 bins, smoothed; each circled peak holds at least 4% of the ink. Life inside the black: 0.057 (under 0.045 reads as flat).

FIVE READS

## Five reads, agreeing on 4 of 5 qualities.

Each quality placed on its ladder by each read, and the mean the engine keeps. Where reads differ, they differ by one rung; close calls resolve down.

READ 1 READ 2 READ 3 READ 4 READ 5 MEAN

Form 2 BUILT 2 BUILT 2 BUILT 2 BUILT 2 BUILT 2.0

Tonal depth 2 MODELLED 2 MODELLED 2 MODELLED 2 MODELLED 2 MODELLED 2.0

Layering 2 LEGIBLE 2 LEGIBLE 2 LEGIBLE 2 LEGIBLE 2 LEGIBLE 2.0

Composition 2 WORKING 2 WORKING 2 WORKING 2 WORKING 2 WORKING 2.0

Material and surface 1 FLAWED 1 FLAWED 2 SOUND 2 SOUND 1 FLAWED 1.4

### READ 1, IN ITS OWN WORDS

“A good sweeping grey arc with real texture, held back by a bulky, flat black mass at the top left, crowded blocks along the left edge, and small rings and blooms where the mass meets the arc. Ordinary overall, close to R2.”

Form · BUILT

Large arc right/centre reads as one travelled stroke with dry-brush tail; top-left black mass is bulky, left vertical blocks blunt and stiff.

WEAKEST Bulky slab-like dark mass at top left

STRONGEST Sweeping grey arc following the brush travel

Tonal depth · MODELLED

Arc interior shows mottled grain, banding and graded greys; six tonal steps. Top-left black mass mostly uniform except a lighter lower lobe.

WEAKEST Top-left black mass largely flat inside

STRONGEST Grey arc with grain, mottling and stepped density

Layering · LEGIBLE

Pale wide arc, darker inner grey band and black accents read as distinct passes; at left the black simply covers earlier grey.

WEAKEST Black mass covers greys beneath at left

STRONGEST Translucent grey arc passes overlapping legibly

Composition · WORKING

Arc sweeps from dark top-left down and up to top right, shaping open upper paper; left edge clustered and crowded, lower left scattered splashes.

WEAKEST Crowded left edge with blocky verticals

STRONGEST Large arc carrying eye left to upper right

Material and surface · FLAWED

Small rings/blooms at centre-left where dark mass meets arc, visible in colour view; mottled tide edges in arc start. Dry-brush right side well handled.

WEAKEST Rings and blooms beside the dark mass

STRONGEST Dry-brush streaking in the right arc

FLAWS

## 3 distinct places, 1 major.

Each read must name every flaw and where it is, in a ninth of the sheet. Here the reads named flaws in 3 distinct places, 14 mentions in all across 5 reads; the number in each ninth is how many times a flaw was named there. Reads agreeing on a place strengthen the evidence for one flaw; they do not multiply it. A major flaw holds Material and surface at rung 1.

GEOMETRY

## Measured from the 16-bit master.

The previous engine (V22) measured this sheet's master file: 6 principal ink masses traced (cyan), 7 enclosed voids at true size in their grid cells (amber), the main gesture from start to end (red). Of 23 edge segments, 39% crisp, 26% soft or bloomed, 35% broken.

RULE 1 Two tonal steps or fewer

Tonal depth held at rung 1. 6 steps: not applied

RULE 2 A major flaw

Material held at rung 1. Mild waves in the unmounted paper are never a flaw. 1 major flaw: applied

RULE 3 Any quality below 0.5

The rating cannot exceed 4. lowest 1.4

RULE 4 At least two valid reads

A read that breaks the reply format is discarded. 5 of 5 valid

THE ARITHMETIC

## V23 rating 5.3.

Engine v23.8, 5 reads. Fixed arithmetic, the same for every painting; the constants were set on 24 randomly chosen paintings so the median sheet scores 5. The scale is relative to this archive, not to painting in general, and a difference of less than half a point between two paintings is noise.

MEAN RUNG 1.88 (2.0 + 2.0 + 2.0 + 2.0 + 1.4) ÷ 5
→

RAW 4.76 1 + 2 × 1.88
→

RATING 5.3 5 + 2.086 × (4.76 − 4.60)

## Where next

[Every record the full archive](https://peteryuill.art/archive)[2026.05.14 every painting from this date](https://peteryuill.art/days/2026-05-14)
