---
title: "T_322, full record | Crucible Year"
url: https://peteryuill.art/archive/works/T_322
description: "Crucible Year: a continuous year of sumi ink painting on paper by Peter Yuill, begun 29 December 2025."
source: generated from the Crucible Year master database
---

Archive · full record

# T_322

[The work as shown](https://peteryuill.art/works/T_322). Every value below comes from vae.db, the master database of the Crucible Year.

## Recorded

- **Date:** 2026.05.31, day 154
- **Size:** 97 × 180 cm
- **Paper:** S11, Red Star Mo She Special Effect Xieyi, raw
- **Inks:** MB4, MB5, MB6
- **Phase:** P3 The Floor Rises

- **Shown on the site:** yes (V23 rating of 5.0 or higher)

- **Early storage triage:** PT: probably trash (Peter's early system, since retired)

## Measured · V23 (v23.8)

- **V23 rating:** 6.3
- **Form:** 2.8
- **Tonal depth:** 2
- **Layering:** 2.2
- **Composition:** 2
- **Material and surface:** 1.6
- **Ink cover:** 78%
- **Dark share:** 24%
- **Tonal steps:** 3

- **Flaws named by the reads:** bloom 3, other 10, water stain 4

The V23 rating runs from 1 to 9, with 5 the middle of this body of work. It is the engine's reading, and the reference the archive is measured against.

## Peter's own rating

- **Rating:** 6

Peter's rating is his own eye, not the engine's, and he never gives a 10.

> “There is always something that can be done better.”

Peter Yuill · 2026.07.02

## Older engine

- **V10C:** 8

From an earlier engine (V10C). Its scale differs from V23's, so it is only ever compared with other readings by the same engine.

## How the number was made

Read by the Visual Analysis Engine, version 23.8, on 2026.10.06: measured by code, then read 5 times by Claude Opus 5.5 against three reference paintings (R1 to R3), each read independent of the others. [How the engine works](https://peteryuill.art/method).

WHAT THE CODE SEES

## Three views of one sheet.

Left, the photograph. Centre, the tone stretch the model is shown beside it: the darkest 45% of tones spread over the whole range, so flat black, banding and stains show. Right, every pixel as the measuring code classes it: cyan black ink, deep teal translucent grey, stone the palest ink, near black bare paper.

![T_322]

![T_322, tone-stretched]

![T_322, classed by brightness]

78% of the sheet carries ink

TONAL STEPS

## 3 families of tone.

Every inked pixel's brightness in 64 bins, smoothed; each circled peak holds at least 4% of the ink. Life inside the black: 0.038 (under 0.045 reads as flat).

FIVE READS

## Five reads, agreeing on 2 of 5 qualities.

Each quality placed on its ladder by each read, and the mean the engine keeps. Where reads differ, they differ by one rung; close calls resolve down.

READ 1 READ 2 READ 3 READ 4 READ 5 MEAN

Form 2 BUILT 3 FLUENT 3 FLUENT 3 FLUENT 3 FLUENT 2.8

Tonal depth 2 MODELLED 2 MODELLED 2 MODELLED 2 MODELLED 2 MODELLED 2.0

Layering 2 LEGIBLE 2 LEGIBLE 2 LEGIBLE 3 ORDERED 2 LEGIBLE 2.2

Composition 2 WORKING 2 WORKING 2 WORKING 2 WORKING 2 WORKING 2.0

Material and surface 1 FLAWED 2 SOUND 2 SOUND 2 SOUND 1 FLAWED 1.6

### READ 1, IN ITS OWN WORDS

“This sheet of concentric arcs echoes R3 but is thinner: the black arc is flat inside, the layering is simple, the upper left is weak, and drips mark the black arc's top edge. An ordinary, working sheet.”

Form · BUILT

Concentric arcs hold and follow the brush's travel; the dark arc's top end is cut square, and the pale left arcs dissolve into soft, loose edges.

WEAKEST Blunt squared top end of dark arc with drips

STRONGEST Mid-grey arc sweeping into dry-brush tail

Tonal depth · MODELLED

Grey bands show bristle streaks and graded tone; the measured dark-interior modulation is under the flat threshold, with only faint banding in the black arc; three tonal steps.

WEAKEST Dark arc interior largely flat (modulation 0.038)

STRONGEST Grey arcs streaked with bristle grain and arcs

Layering · LEGIBLE

Pale, mid-grey and black arc passes overlap translucently and stay readable, but the order is simple and the overlaps add little depth.

WEAKEST Pale left arcs barely register as a pass

STRONGEST Black arc laid over the mid-grey band, legible

Composition · WORKING

The rotating arcs give a strong clockwise direction and the lower-left void is shaped; the upper left is pale and weak, and the weight is crowded right.

WEAKEST Washed-out upper-left quarter

STRONGEST Sweeping spiral carrying eye to lower right

Material and surface · FLAWED

Small runs and blots sit on the top edge of the black arc, drops trail below the grey arc at centre-left, crease lines cross the grey bands, and there are bluish spots at the right edge.

WEAKEST Drips and blots at top of black arc

STRONGEST Dry-brush grain in grey arc tail

FLAWS

## 5 distinct places, 0 major.

Each read must name every flaw and where it is, in a ninth of the sheet. Here the reads named flaws in 5 distinct places, 17 mentions in all across 5 reads; the number in each ninth is how many times a flaw was named there. Reads agreeing on a place strengthen the evidence for one flaw; they do not multiply it.

GEOMETRY

## Measured from the 16-bit master.

The previous engine (V22) measured this sheet's master file: 3 principal ink masses traced (cyan), 6 enclosed voids at true size in their grid cells (amber), the main gesture from start to end (red). Of 19 edge segments, 32% crisp, 47% soft or bloomed, 21% broken.

RULE 1 Two tonal steps or fewer

Tonal depth held at rung 1. 3 steps: not applied

RULE 2 A major flaw

Material held at rung 1. Mild waves in the unmounted paper are never a flaw. none named

RULE 3 Any quality below 0.5

The rating cannot exceed 4. lowest 1.6

RULE 4 At least two valid reads

A read that breaks the reply format is discarded. 5 of 5 valid

THE ARITHMETIC

## V23 rating 6.3.

Engine v23.8, 5 reads. Fixed arithmetic, the same for every painting; the constants were set on 24 randomly chosen paintings so the median sheet scores 5. The scale is relative to this archive, not to painting in general, and a difference of less than half a point between two paintings is noise.

MEAN RUNG 2.12 (2.8 + 2.0 + 2.2 + 2.0 + 1.6) ÷ 5
→

RAW 5.24 1 + 2 × 2.12
→

RATING 6.3 5 + 2.086 × (5.24 − 4.60)

## Where next

[Every record the full archive](https://peteryuill.art/archive)[2026.05.31 every painting from this date](https://peteryuill.art/days/2026-05-31)
