---
title: "T_337, full record | Crucible Year"
url: https://peteryuill.art/archive/works/T_337
description: "Crucible Year: a continuous year of sumi ink painting on paper by Peter Yuill, begun 29 December 2025."
source: generated from the Crucible Year master database
---

Archive · full record

# T_337

[The work as shown](https://peteryuill.art/works/T_337). Every value below comes from vae.db, the master database of the Crucible Year.

## Recorded

- **Date:** 2026.06.03, day 157
- **Size:** 97 × 180 cm
- **Paper:** S12, Red Star Mo She Special Effect Xieyi, half-raw
- **Inks:** MB4, MB5, MB6
- **Phase:** P3 The Floor Rises

- **Shown on the site:** yes (V23 rating of 5.0 or higher)

- **Early storage triage:** SHP: save, has potential (Peter's early system, since retired)

## Measured · V23 (v23.8)

- **V23 rating:** 7
- **Form:** 2.4
- **Tonal depth:** 2
- **Layering:** 3
- **Composition:** 2
- **Material and surface:** 2
- **Ink cover:** 85%
- **Dark share:** 59%
- **Tonal steps:** 6

- **Flaws named by the reads:** other 11

The V23 rating runs from 1 to 9, with 5 the middle of this body of work. It is the engine's reading, and the reference the archive is measured against.

## Peter's own rating

- **Rating:** 8

Peter's rating is his own eye, not the engine's, and he never gives a 10.

> “There is always something that can be done better.”

Peter Yuill · 2026.07.02

## Older engine

- **V10C:** 8

From an earlier engine (V10C). Its scale differs from V23's, so it is only ever compared with other readings by the same engine.

## How the number was made

Read by the Visual Analysis Engine, version 23.8, on 2026.10.06: measured by code, then read 5 times by Claude Opus 5.5 against three reference paintings (R1 to R3), each read independent of the others. [How the engine works](https://peteryuill.art/method).

WHAT THE CODE SEES

## Three views of one sheet.

Left, the photograph. Centre, the tone stretch the model is shown beside it: the darkest 45% of tones spread over the whole range, so flat black, banding and stains show. Right, every pixel as the measuring code classes it: cyan black ink, deep teal translucent grey, stone the palest ink, near black bare paper.

![T_337]

![T_337, tone-stretched]

![T_337, classed by brightness]

85% of the sheet carries ink

TONAL STEPS

## 6 families of tone.

Every inked pixel's brightness in 64 bins, smoothed; each circled peak holds at least 4% of the ink. Life inside the black: 0.055 (under 0.045 reads as flat).

FIVE READS

## Five reads, agreeing on 4 of 5 qualities.

Each quality placed on its ladder by each read, and the mean the engine keeps. Where reads differ, they differ by one rung; close calls resolve down.

READ 1 READ 2 READ 3 READ 4 READ 5 MEAN

Form 2 BUILT 2 BUILT 2 BUILT 3 FLUENT 3 FLUENT 2.4

Tonal depth 2 MODELLED 2 MODELLED 2 MODELLED 2 MODELLED 2 MODELLED 2.0

Layering 3 ORDERED 3 ORDERED 3 ORDERED 3 ORDERED 3 ORDERED 3.0

Composition 2 WORKING 2 WORKING 2 WORKING 2 WORKING 2 WORKING 2.0

Material and surface 2 SOUND 2 SOUND 2 SOUND 2 SOUND 2 SOUND 2.0

### READ 1, IN ITS OWN WORDS

“A radial arc composition in the manner of R3, with clear translucent layering, but heavier and more crowded. The large lower-right black is bulky and flat inside, which keeps form, tone and composition at an ordinary level.”

Form · BUILT

Concentric arc bands hold their walls and follow the sweep; the lower-right black mass and top-right inner rectangle read as bulky, filled slabs.

WEAKEST Heavy lower-right black block, bulky and filled in

STRONGEST Upper central dark arc band following brush travel

Tonal depth · MODELLED

Upper arcs show banding, dry streaks and grain; grey left bands stepped. Large lower-right black is mostly flat; modulation 0.055 only modest.

WEAKEST Lower-right black mass, near-uniform interior

STRONGEST Upper central arc band with brush banding and grain

Layering · ORDERED

Six tonal steps; pale, mid and dark arc passes overlap translucently in a readable order on left and top right, building depth like R3.

WEAKEST Lower-right black covers earlier passes opaquely

STRONGEST Stepped translucent grey arcs on left and top right

Composition · WORKING

Radial arcs carry the eye round to the open circle at bottom centre; the white gap is shaped, but 85% coverage leaves the right crowded and weighty.

WEAKEST Crowded, heavy dark lower right

STRONGEST White vertical channel opening into bottom-centre circle

Material and surface · SOUND

Ink controlled; small ink drops near left-centre gap and a speck at right edge; paper creases visible in tone-stretched darks, not disruptive.

WEAKEST Stray drips beside left-centre grey bands

STRONGEST Dry-brush trailing edges at bottom right of arcs

FLAWS

## 4 distinct places, 0 major.

Each read must name every flaw and where it is, in a ninth of the sheet. Here the reads named flaws in 4 distinct places, 11 mentions in all across 5 reads; the number in each ninth is how many times a flaw was named there. Reads agreeing on a place strengthen the evidence for one flaw; they do not multiply it.

GEOMETRY

## Measured from the 16-bit master.

The previous engine (V22) measured this sheet's master file: 2 principal ink masses traced (cyan), 3 enclosed voids at true size in their grid cells (amber), the main gesture from start to end (red). Of 18 edge segments, 50% crisp, 50% soft or bloomed, 0% broken.

RULE 1 Two tonal steps or fewer

Tonal depth held at rung 1. 6 steps: not applied

RULE 2 A major flaw

Material held at rung 1. Mild waves in the unmounted paper are never a flaw. none named

RULE 3 Any quality below 0.5

The rating cannot exceed 4. lowest 2.0

RULE 4 At least two valid reads

A read that breaks the reply format is discarded. 5 of 5 valid

THE ARITHMETIC

## V23 rating 7.0.

Engine v23.8, 5 reads. Fixed arithmetic, the same for every painting; the constants were set on 24 randomly chosen paintings so the median sheet scores 5. The scale is relative to this archive, not to painting in general, and a difference of less than half a point between two paintings is noise.

MEAN RUNG 2.28 (2.4 + 2.0 + 3.0 + 2.0 + 2.0) ÷ 5
→

RAW 5.56 1 + 2 × 2.28
→

RATING 7.0 5 + 2.086 × (5.56 − 4.60)

## Where next

[Every record the full archive](https://peteryuill.art/archive)[2026.06.03 every painting from this date](https://peteryuill.art/days/2026-06-03)
