---
title: "T_355, full record | Crucible Year"
url: https://peteryuill.art/archive/works/T_355
description: "Crucible Year: a continuous year of sumi ink painting on paper by Peter Yuill, begun 29 December 2025."
source: generated from the Crucible Year master database
---

Archive · full record

# T_355

[The work as shown](https://peteryuill.art/works/T_355). Every value below comes from vae.db, the master database of the Crucible Year.

## Recorded

- **Date:** 2026.06.14, day 168
- **Size:** 180 × 97 cm
- **Paper:** S10, Red Star Mo She Imitation Antique Chu bark, Exhibition Edition
- **Inks:** MB4, MB5, MB6
- **Phase:** P3 The Floor Rises

- **Shown on the site:** yes (V23 rating of 5.0 or higher)

- **Early storage triage:** SHP: save, has potential (Peter's early system, since retired)

## Measured · V23 (v23.8)

- **V23 rating:** 6.8
- **Form:** 2.4
- **Tonal depth:** 2
- **Layering:** 2.8
- **Composition:** 2
- **Material and surface:** 2
- **Ink cover:** 90%
- **Dark share:** 62%
- **Tonal steps:** 4

- **Flaws named by the reads:** water stain 3, other 6, dead ink 1

The V23 rating runs from 1 to 9, with 5 the middle of this body of work. It is the engine's reading, and the reference the archive is measured against.

## Peter's own rating

- **Rating:** 9

Peter's rating is his own eye, not the engine's, and he never gives a 10.

> “There is always something that can be done better.”

Peter Yuill · 2026.07.02

## Older engine

- **V10C:** 8

From an earlier engine (V10C). Its scale differs from V23's, so it is only ever compared with other readings by the same engine.

## How the number was made

Read by the Visual Analysis Engine, version 23.8, on 2026.10.06: measured by code, then read 5 times by Claude Opus 5.5 against three reference paintings (R1 to R3), each read independent of the others. [How the engine works](https://peteryuill.art/method).

WHAT THE CODE SEES

## Three views of one sheet.

Left, the photograph. Centre, the tone stretch the model is shown beside it: the darkest 45% of tones spread over the whole range, so flat black, banding and stains show. Right, every pixel as the measuring code classes it: cyan black ink, deep teal translucent grey, stone the palest ink, near black bare paper.

![T_355]

![T_355, tone-stretched]

![T_355, classed by brightness]

90% of the sheet carries ink

TONAL STEPS

## 4 families of tone.

Every inked pixel's brightness in 64 bins, smoothed; each circled peak holds at least 4% of the ink. Life inside the black: 0.043 (under 0.045 reads as flat).

FIVE READS

## Five reads, agreeing on 3 of 5 qualities.

Each quality placed on its ladder by each read, and the mean the engine keeps. Where reads differ, they differ by one rung; close calls resolve down.

READ 1 READ 2 READ 3 READ 4 READ 5 MEAN

Form 2 BUILT 2 BUILT 3 FLUENT 3 FLUENT 2 BUILT 2.4

Tonal depth 2 MODELLED 2 MODELLED 2 MODELLED 2 MODELLED 2 MODELLED 2.0

Layering 3 ORDERED 2 LEGIBLE 3 ORDERED 3 ORDERED 3 ORDERED 2.8

Composition 2 WORKING 2 WORKING 2 WORKING 2 WORKING 2 WORKING 2.0

Material and surface 2 SOUND 2 SOUND 2 SOUND 2 SOUND 2 SOUND 2.0

### READ 1, IN ITS OWN WORDS

“The arc-and-fan construction is related to R3 and the passes are legibly layered. But the sheet is crowded, the central dark is flat, and the lower mass is bulky, which keeps it near ordinary.”

Form · BUILT

Arc sweeps and the fan follow the brush's travel and their walls hold. The big lower-left dark mass reads as filled-in bulk, not a fluent stroke.

WEAKEST bulky filled lower-left dark quarter-disc

STRONGEST radiating fan strokes at bottom right

Tonal depth · MODELLED

The tone-stretched view shows banding in the upper arcs and the fan. Dark interior modulation is 0.043, below the flat threshold, so the main dark core stays flat.

WEAKEST central dark core of lower arc mass

STRONGEST banded greys in upper arc sweeps

Layering · ORDERED

Several translucent arc passes overlap in a readable order across the upper spiral and the bottom fan. Overlaps build depth, though they thicken toward the centre.

WEAKEST dense centre where passes stack toward black

STRONGEST overlapping translucent fan blades at bottom

Composition · WORKING

A strong S-spiral moves the eye from the top arc to the bottom fan. At 90% coverage it is crowded, and the only shaped space is the small left notch.

WEAKEST crowded sheet with little shaped empty paper

STRONGEST S-shaped double spiral carrying the eye downward

Material and surface · SOUND

The ink is controlled, with bristle grain at the arc edges. Mottled cloudiness inside the lower-left mass shows only in the stretched view. Stray dots sit at the bottom right.

WEAKEST cloudy mottling inside lower-left dark mass

STRONGEST dry-brush bristle grain on arc edges

FLAWS

## 3 distinct places, 0 major.

Each read must name every flaw and where it is, in a ninth of the sheet. Here the reads named flaws in 3 distinct places, 10 mentions in all across 5 reads; the number in each ninth is how many times a flaw was named there. Reads agreeing on a place strengthen the evidence for one flaw; they do not multiply it.

GEOMETRY

## Measured from the 16-bit master.

The previous engine (V22) measured this sheet's master file: 1 principal ink mass traced (cyan), 4 enclosed voids at true size in their grid cells (amber), the main gesture from start to end (red). Of 13 edge segments, 39% crisp, 39% soft or bloomed, 23% broken.

RULE 1 Two tonal steps or fewer

Tonal depth held at rung 1. 4 steps: not applied

RULE 2 A major flaw

Material held at rung 1. Mild waves in the unmounted paper are never a flaw. none named

RULE 3 Any quality below 0.5

The rating cannot exceed 4. lowest 2.0

RULE 4 At least two valid reads

A read that breaks the reply format is discarded. 5 of 5 valid

THE ARITHMETIC

## V23 rating 6.8.

Engine v23.8, 5 reads. Fixed arithmetic, the same for every painting; the constants were set on 24 randomly chosen paintings so the median sheet scores 5. The scale is relative to this archive, not to painting in general, and a difference of less than half a point between two paintings is noise.

MEAN RUNG 2.24 (2.4 + 2.0 + 2.8 + 2.0 + 2.0) ÷ 5
→

RAW 5.48 1 + 2 × 2.24
→

RATING 6.8 5 + 2.086 × (5.48 − 4.60)

## Where next

[Every record the full archive](https://peteryuill.art/archive)[2026.06.14 every painting from this date](https://peteryuill.art/days/2026-06-14)
