Crucible Year Peter Yuill
Archive · full record

T_157

The work as shown. Every value below comes from vae.db, the master database of the Crucible Year.

Recorded

Date
2026.03.28, day 90
Size
70 × 180 cm
Paper
S3, Tanxi Jing Pi, raw
Inks
MB1, MB2, MB3
Phase
P1 Warm-up
Shown on the site
yes (V23 rating of 5.0 or higher)
Early storage triage
PT: probably trash (Peter's early system, since retired)

Measured · V23 (v23.8)

V23 rating
5
Form
2
Tonal depth
2
Layering
2
Composition
2
Material and surface
1
Ink cover
89%
Dark share
57%
Tonal steps
4
Flaws named by the reads
water stain 7, other 6, tide line 3, bloom 2, ring 2
The V23 rating runs from 1 to 9, with 5 the middle of this body of work. It is the engine's reading, and the reference the archive is measured against.

Older engine

V7
8
From an earlier engine (V7). Its scale differs from V23's, so it is only ever compared with other readings by the same engine.

How the number was made

Read by the Visual Analysis Engine, version 23.8, on 2026.10.06: measured by code, then read 5 times by Claude Opus 5.5 against three reference paintings (R1 to R3), each read independent of the others. How the engine works.

WHAT THE CODE SEES

Three views of one sheet.

Left, the photograph. Centre, the tone stretch the model is shown beside it: the darkest 45% of tones spread over the whole range, so flat black, banding and stains show. Right, every pixel as the measuring code classes it: cyan black ink, deep teal translucent grey, stone the palest ink, near black bare paper.

T_157T_157, tone-stretchedT_157, classed by brightness
89%of the sheet carries ink
Black 57%Grey 31%Light 12% SHARE OF THE INK, NOT OF THE SHEET
TONAL STEPS

4 families of tone.

Every inked pixel's brightness in 64 bins, smoothed; each circled peak holds at least 4% of the ink. Life inside the black: 0.048 (under 0.045 reads as flat).

0.300.751234 BLACK INK TRANSLUCENT GREYS PALEST INK, 0.88 LUMINANCE OF EVERY INKED PIXEL, 64 BINS. PAPER (ABOVE 0.88) IS LEFT OUT.
FIVE READS

Five reads, one answer.

Each quality placed on its ladder by each read, and the mean the engine keeps.

READ 1READ 2READ 3READ 4READ 5MEAN
Form2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2.0
Tonal depth2MODELLED2MODELLED2MODELLED2MODELLED2MODELLED2.0
Layering2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2.0
Composition2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2.0
Material and surface1FLAWED1FLAWED1FLAWED1FLAWED1FLAWED1.0

READ 1, IN ITS OWN WORDS

“Landscape-like wave of layered grey and black bands with good horizontal flow and a fine dry-brush arc at right, but a heavy, flat lower black mass and small water accidents near centre keep it ordinary.”

Form · BUILT

Wave bands follow brush travel through centre and right; lower-left black mass is a heavy filled slab with stiff vertical left edge.

WEAKEST Bottom-left dark slab, bulky and filled-in

STRONGEST Right sweeping arc wave with dry-brush striations

Tonal depth · MODELLED

Stretched view shows stepped greys and arcs in right wave and upper-left band; lower black band is largely flat; modulation 0.048 just above flat.

WEAKEST Lower dark band interior nearly uniform

STRONGEST Right arc grey with striations and graded density

Layering · LEGIBLE

Pale splash layer top, grey wave bands, then black base; overlaps readable at left and right, but bottom black largely buries what is beneath.

WEAKEST Lower black band covers earlier passes

STRONGEST Grey upper-left band overlapping dark band, legible

Composition · WORKING

Wave line gives clear horizontal flow; 89% coverage leaves little shaped paper; top-left splashes scattered; lower half dead weight.

WEAKEST Bottom half crowded, heavy dark mass

STRONGEST Undulating horizon wave carrying eye left to right

Material and surface · FLAWED

Cloudy pale patch and ring near centre at dark band edge, white nick mid-right in black, vertical streak marks in lower black; visible in colour view.

WEAKEST Pale milky blotch at centre on dark edge

STRONGEST Dry-brush striations in right arc

FLAWS

5 distinct places, 0 major.

Each read must name every flaw and where it is, in a ninth of the sheet. Here the reads named flaws in 5 distinct places, 20 mentions in all across 5 reads; the number in each ninth is how many times a flaw was named there. Reads agreeing on a place strengthen the evidence for one flaw; they do not multiply it.

3 × WATER STAIN, RING“scattered drops and cloudy pale rings top rig…”6 × WATER STAIN, OTHER, RING, BLOOM“Pale cloudy patch at edge of dark band, centre”3 × OTHER“White nick/void inside black band mid-right”5 × TIDE LINE, OTHER, WATER STAIN“Vertical streak lines inside lower black mass”3 × BLOOM, OTHER, WATER STAIN“Pale bloom at lower-right edge of dark mass”WATER STAINBLOOMRINGTIDE LINEOTHER
GEOMETRY

Measured from the 16-bit master.

The previous engine (V22) measured this sheet's master file: 1 principal ink mass traced (cyan), 9 enclosed voids at true size in their grid cells (amber), the main gesture from start to end (red). Of 17 edge segments, 18% crisp, 47% soft or bloomed, 35% broken.

A1B1C1D1E1F1A2B2C2D2E2F2A3B3C3D3E3F3H1H2H3H4H5H6H7H8H9
RULE 1Two tonal steps or fewer

Tonal depth held at rung 1.

4 steps: not applied
RULE 2A major flaw

Material held at rung 1. Mild waves in the unmounted paper are never a flaw.

none named
RULE 3Any quality below 0.5

The rating cannot exceed 4.

lowest 1.0
RULE 4At least two valid reads

A read that breaks the reply format is discarded.

5 of 5 valid
THE ARITHMETIC

V23 rating 5.0.

Engine v23.8, 5 reads. Fixed arithmetic, the same for every painting; the constants were set on 24 randomly chosen paintings so the median sheet scores 5. The scale is relative to this archive, not to painting in general, and a difference of less than half a point between two paintings is noise.

MEAN RUNG1.80(2.0 + 2.0 + 2.0 + 2.0 + 1.0) ÷ 5
→
RAW4.601 + 2 × 1.80
→
RATING5.05 + 2.086 × (4.60 − 4.60)