Crucible Year Peter Yuill
Archive · full record

T_249

The work as shown. Every value below comes from vae.db, the master database of the Crucible Year.

Recorded

Date
2026.04.21, day 114
Size
70 × 180 cm
Paper
S3, Tanxi Jing Pi, raw
Inks
MB4, MB5, MB6
Phase
P2 The Switch
Shown on the site
yes (V23 rating of 5.0 or higher)
Early storage triage
SHP: save, has potential (Peter's early system, since retired)

Measured · V23 (v23.8)

V23 rating
5.8
Form
2
Tonal depth
2
Layering
2
Composition
2
Material and surface
2
Ink cover
69%
Dark share
42%
Tonal steps
5
Flaws named by the reads
water stain 3, other 4, bloom 2
The V23 rating runs from 1 to 9, with 5 the middle of this body of work. It is the engine's reading, and the reference the archive is measured against.

Peter's own rating

Rating
4
Peter's rating is his own eye, not the engine's, and he never gives a 10.
“There is always something that can be done better.”
Peter Yuill · 2026.07.02

Older engine

V7
8
From an earlier engine (V7). Its scale differs from V23's, so it is only ever compared with other readings by the same engine.

How the number was made

Read by the Visual Analysis Engine, version 23.8, on 2026.10.06: measured by code, then read 5 times by Claude Opus 5.5 against three reference paintings (R1 to R3), each read independent of the others. How the engine works.

WHAT THE CODE SEES

Three views of one sheet.

Left, the photograph. Centre, the tone stretch the model is shown beside it: the darkest 45% of tones spread over the whole range, so flat black, banding and stains show. Right, every pixel as the measuring code classes it: cyan black ink, deep teal translucent grey, stone the palest ink, near black bare paper.

T_249T_249, tone-stretchedT_249, classed by brightness
69%of the sheet carries ink
Black 42%Grey 45%Light 13% SHARE OF THE INK, NOT OF THE SHEET
TONAL STEPS

5 families of tone.

Every inked pixel's brightness in 64 bins, smoothed; each circled peak holds at least 4% of the ink. Life inside the black: 0.061 (under 0.045 reads as flat).

0.300.7512345 BLACK INK TRANSLUCENT GREYS PALEST INK, 0.88 LUMINANCE OF EVERY INKED PIXEL, 64 BINS. PAPER (ABOVE 0.88) IS LEFT OUT.
FIVE READS

Five reads, one answer.

Each quality placed on its ladder by each read, and the mean the engine keeps.

READ 1READ 2READ 3READ 4READ 5MEAN
Form2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2.0
Tonal depth2MODELLED2MODELLED2MODELLED2MODELLED2MODELLED2.0
Layering2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2.0
Composition2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2.0
Material and surface2SOUND2SOUND2SOUND2SOUND2SOUND2.0

READ 1, IN ITS OWN WORDS

“Gestural sweeping arc with a busy splattered left mass, a blunt centre wedge and a fluent right crescent. The movement is good, but the left side is crowded and some darks are flat. An ordinary sheet near R2.”

Form · BUILT

Right crescent and long grey sweep follow brush travel; centre wedge is blunt; left mass is a lobed splash with weak walls.

WEAKEST Left dark mass, splattered and lobed, edges dissolve

STRONGEST Right crescent stroke sweeping upward

Tonal depth · MODELLED

Five tonal steps; grey band shows striation and grading; left mass mottled; centre wedge and lower right dark fairly uniform inside.

WEAKEST Centre dark wedge, largely flat interior

STRONGEST Grey sweep with brush striation and graded density

Layering · LEGIBLE

Pale grey arc pass under darker strokes stays readable at right and centre; left cluster overlaps less clearly ordered.

WEAKEST Left area where dark splashes clot over greys

STRONGEST Dark crescent laid over translucent grey arc at right

Composition · WORKING

Long arc carries eye across sheet; upper empty paper shaped by the curve; left quarter crowded and congested with splatter.

WEAKEST Crowded, busy left cluster

STRONGEST Continuous swooping arc from left to upper right

Material and surface · SOUND

Ink controlled overall; slightly milky cloudy grey around left mass and pale patch beside it; no tide lines in principal darks.

WEAKEST Cloudy grey wash halo around left mass

STRONGEST Dry-brush striation inside right crescent and grey sweep

FLAWS

4 distinct places, 0 major.

Each read must name every flaw and where it is, in a ninth of the sheet. Here the reads named flaws in 4 distinct places, 9 mentions in all across 5 reads; the number in each ninth is how many times a flaw was named there. Reads agreeing on a place strengthen the evidence for one flaw; they do not multiply it.

1 × OTHER“stray ink dots in empty upper-centre paper”1 × OTHER“stray ink drops scattered in the empty upper …”5 × WATER STAIN, BLOOM“Cloudy pale grey wash around left dark mass”2 × OTHER“pale milky streaks inside centre dark wedge”WATER STAINBLOOMOTHER
GEOMETRY

Measured from the 16-bit master.

The previous engine (V22) measured this sheet's master file: 1 principal ink mass traced (cyan), 5 enclosed voids at true size in their grid cells (amber), the main gesture from start to end (red). Of 16 edge segments, 25% crisp, 63% soft or bloomed, 13% broken.

A1B1C1D1E1F1A2B2C2D2E2F2A3B3C3D3E3F3H1H2H3H4H5
RULE 1Two tonal steps or fewer

Tonal depth held at rung 1.

5 steps: not applied
RULE 2A major flaw

Material held at rung 1. Mild waves in the unmounted paper are never a flaw.

none named
RULE 3Any quality below 0.5

The rating cannot exceed 4.

lowest 2.0
RULE 4At least two valid reads

A read that breaks the reply format is discarded.

5 of 5 valid
THE ARITHMETIC

V23 rating 5.8.

Engine v23.8, 5 reads. Fixed arithmetic, the same for every painting; the constants were set on 24 randomly chosen paintings so the median sheet scores 5. The scale is relative to this archive, not to painting in general, and a difference of less than half a point between two paintings is noise.

MEAN RUNG2.00(2.0 + 2.0 + 2.0 + 2.0 + 2.0) ÷ 5
→
RAW5.001 + 2 × 2.00
→
RATING5.85 + 2.086 × (5.00 − 4.60)