Crucible Year Peter Yuill
Archive · full record

T_250

The work as shown. Every value below comes from vae.db, the master database of the Crucible Year.

Recorded

Date
2026.04.21, day 114
Size
70 × 180 cm
Paper
S3, Tanxi Jing Pi, raw
Inks
MB4, MB5, MB6
Phase
P2 The Switch
Shown on the site
yes (V23 rating of 5.0 or higher)
Early storage triage
SA: save, archive (Peter's early system, since retired)

Measured · V23 (v23.8)

V23 rating
5
Form
2
Tonal depth
2
Layering
2
Composition
2
Material and surface
1
Ink cover
69%
Dark share
31%
Tonal steps
5
Flaws named by the reads
bloom 8, water stain 2, ring 3
The V23 rating runs from 1 to 9, with 5 the middle of this body of work. It is the engine's reading, and the reference the archive is measured against.

Older engine

V7
4
From an earlier engine (V7). Its scale differs from V23's, so it is only ever compared with other readings by the same engine.

How the number was made

Read by the Visual Analysis Engine, version 23.8, on 2026.10.06: measured by code, then read 5 times by Claude Opus 5.5 against three reference paintings (R1 to R3), each read independent of the others. How the engine works.

WHAT THE CODE SEES

Three views of one sheet.

Left, the photograph. Centre, the tone stretch the model is shown beside it: the darkest 45% of tones spread over the whole range, so flat black, banding and stains show. Right, every pixel as the measuring code classes it: cyan black ink, deep teal translucent grey, stone the palest ink, near black bare paper.

T_250T_250, tone-stretchedT_250, classed by brightness
69%of the sheet carries ink
Black 31%Grey 48%Light 21% SHARE OF THE INK, NOT OF THE SHEET
TONAL STEPS

5 families of tone.

Every inked pixel's brightness in 64 bins, smoothed; each circled peak holds at least 4% of the ink. Life inside the black: 0.054 (under 0.045 reads as flat).

0.300.7512345 BLACK INK TRANSLUCENT GREYS PALEST INK, 0.88 LUMINANCE OF EVERY INKED PIXEL, 64 BINS. PAPER (ABOVE 0.88) IS LEFT OUT.
FIVE READS

Five reads, one answer.

Each quality placed on its ladder by each read, and the mean the engine keeps.

READ 1READ 2READ 3READ 4READ 5MEAN
Form2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2.0
Tonal depth2MODELLED2MODELLED2MODELLED2MODELLED2MODELLED2.0
Layering2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2.0
Composition2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2.0
Material and surface1FLAWED1FLAWED1FLAWED1FLAWED1FLAWED1.0

READ 1, IN ITS OWN WORDS

“A gestural wave sweep with some tonal life in the right diagonal. It is ordinary in form, layering and composition, and cellular water blooms in the central sweep mark the surface. It is closest to R2.”

Form · BUILT

Wave sweep from left down through centre to right reads as a coherent form; left dark mass is lumpy and frayed, so some bulk remains.

WEAKEST Left dark mass, ragged lobed outline

STRONGEST Right diagonal dark sweep following brush travel

Tonal depth · MODELLED

Right dark band shows streaks and stepped density; five tonal steps, modulation 0.054; left black mass flatter inside.

WEAKEST Left dark mass interior fairly uniform

STRONGEST Right diagonal band with streaked grey grading

Layering · LEGIBLE

Pale grey sweeps lie under darker strokes at right and left; overlaps readable, but only two or three passes and little ordered build-up.

WEAKEST Centre where droplets blur the grey pass

STRONGEST Dark diagonal over pale grey wash, right

Composition · WORKING

Wave-like curve gives direction and shapes the empty top paper; right edge black fragment and busy lower right feel crowded.

WEAKEST Crowded right edge with cut-off black mass

STRONGEST Wave curve carrying eye left to right

Material and surface · FLAWED

Clusters of ringed, cellular drop blooms sit inside the central grey sweep, visible in colour view; read as water spotting rather than chosen structure.

WEAKEST Cellular water-drop blooms in centre sweep

STRONGEST Dry-brush streaks in right diagonal band

FLAWS

6 distinct places, 1 major.

Each read must name every flaw and where it is, in a ninth of the sheet. Here the reads named flaws in 6 distinct places, 13 mentions in all across 5 reads; the number in each ninth is how many times a flaw was named there. Reads agreeing on a place strengthen the evidence for one flaw; they do not multiply it. A major flaw holds Material and surface at rung 1.

1 × WATER STAIN“Cloudy, mottled wash at the top of the left m…”1 × BLOOM“Bead-like drips along the top of the right arc”1 × WATER STAIN“pale droplet rings near sweep left of centre”5 × BLOOM · MAJOR“ringed droplet blooms inside central grey swe…”3 × RING“Small ringed cells near the lower edge of the…”2 × BLOOM“pale ringed spots in lower right grey wash”WATER STAINBLOOMRINGMAJOR
GEOMETRY

Measured from the 16-bit master.

The previous engine (V22) measured this sheet's master file: 1 principal ink mass traced (cyan), 10 enclosed voids at true size in their grid cells (amber), the main gesture from start to end (red). Of 17 edge segments, 12% crisp, 53% soft or bloomed, 35% broken.

A1B1C1D1E1F1A2B2C2D2E2F2A3B3C3D3E3F3H1H2H3H4H5H6H7H8H9H10
RULE 1Two tonal steps or fewer

Tonal depth held at rung 1.

5 steps: not applied
RULE 2A major flaw

Material held at rung 1. Mild waves in the unmounted paper are never a flaw.

4 major flaws: applied
RULE 3Any quality below 0.5

The rating cannot exceed 4.

lowest 1.0
RULE 4At least two valid reads

A read that breaks the reply format is discarded.

5 of 5 valid
THE ARITHMETIC

V23 rating 5.0.

Engine v23.8, 5 reads. Fixed arithmetic, the same for every painting; the constants were set on 24 randomly chosen paintings so the median sheet scores 5. The scale is relative to this archive, not to painting in general, and a difference of less than half a point between two paintings is noise.

MEAN RUNG1.80(2.0 + 2.0 + 2.0 + 2.0 + 1.0) ÷ 5
→
RAW4.601 + 2 × 1.80
→
RATING5.05 + 2.086 × (4.60 − 4.60)