Crucible Year Peter Yuill
Archive · full record

T_268

The work as shown. Every value below comes from vae.db, the master database of the Crucible Year.

Recorded

Date
2026.04.26, day 119
Size
97 × 180 cm
Paper
S4, Tanxi half-raw, 6-foot
Inks
MB4, MB5, MB6
Phase
P2 The Switch
Shown on the site
yes (V23 rating of 5.0 or higher)
Early storage triage
SA: save, archive (Peter's early system, since retired)

Measured · V23 (v23.8)

V23 rating
6.7
Form
2
Tonal depth
2.2
Layering
3
Composition
2.2
Material and surface
1.6
Ink cover
79%
Dark share
36%
Tonal steps
5
Flaws named by the reads
water stain 7, other 9, ring 3
The V23 rating runs from 1 to 9, with 5 the middle of this body of work. It is the engine's reading, and the reference the archive is measured against.

Older engine

V7
4
From an earlier engine (V7). Its scale differs from V23's, so it is only ever compared with other readings by the same engine.

How the number was made

Read by the Visual Analysis Engine, version 23.8, on 2026.10.06: measured by code, then read 5 times by Claude Opus 5.5 against three reference paintings (R1 to R3), each read independent of the others. How the engine works.

WHAT THE CODE SEES

Three views of one sheet.

Left, the photograph. Centre, the tone stretch the model is shown beside it: the darkest 45% of tones spread over the whole range, so flat black, banding and stains show. Right, every pixel as the measuring code classes it: cyan black ink, deep teal translucent grey, stone the palest ink, near black bare paper.

T_268T_268, tone-stretchedT_268, classed by brightness
79%of the sheet carries ink
Black 36%Grey 41%Light 23% SHARE OF THE INK, NOT OF THE SHEET
TONAL STEPS

5 families of tone.

Every inked pixel's brightness in 64 bins, smoothed; each circled peak holds at least 4% of the ink. Life inside the black: 0.062 (under 0.045 reads as flat).

0.300.7512345 BLACK INK TRANSLUCENT GREYS PALEST INK, 0.88 LUMINANCE OF EVERY INKED PIXEL, 64 BINS. PAPER (ABOVE 0.88) IS LEFT OUT.
FIVE READS

Five reads, agreeing on 2 of 5 qualities.

Each quality placed on its ladder by each read, and the mean the engine keeps. Where reads differ, they differ by one rung; close calls resolve down.

READ 1READ 2READ 3READ 4READ 5MEAN
Form2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2.0
Tonal depth3DEEP2MODELLED2MODELLED2MODELLED2MODELLED2.2
Layering3ORDERED3ORDERED3ORDERED3ORDERED3ORDERED3.0
Composition3COMMANDING2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2.2
Material and surface2SOUND1FLAWED2SOUND2SOUND1FLAWED1.6

READ 1, IN ITS OWN WORDS

“A large layered arc with readable translucent passes and a well-modelled dark mass. The right mass is somewhat slab-like. There are small surface accidents: a pale drip and blot at top centre, and creases.”

Form · BUILT

Left and bottom arcs follow brush travel with dry-brush striations; the right dark mass is a squared, slab-like wedge with a blunt corner edge.

WEAKEST Right dark mass reads as a blunt wedge

STRONGEST Dry-brush left arc following the sweep

Tonal depth · DEEP

Dark interior modulation 0.062, five tonal steps; right mass shows streaking, drips and grain, and grey arcs are banded with graded overlaps.

WEAKEST Lower centre dark band fairly even

STRONGEST Right dark mass with streaks and grain

Layering · ORDERED

Several translucent arcs stack in readable order from pale outer to dark inner; overlaps build depth, though the right black partly covers earlier passes.

WEAKEST Dark mass covers some underlying grey passes

STRONGEST Overlapping translucent grey arcs at left-centre

Composition · COMMANDING

A single large arc carries the eye left to right; the pale bowl above is shaped by the arcs. Bottom is heavy and cropped, right top slightly busy.

WEAKEST Busy dripped top edge of dark mass

STRONGEST Sweeping bowl arc framing the empty top

Material and surface · SOUND

Ink controlled with good dry-brush; a pale stray drip trail and blot sits top centre, paper creases cross the greys, and a vertical crease line marks the dark mass.

WEAKEST Pale drip trail and blot at top centre

STRONGEST Dry-brush edges on left and right arcs

FLAWS

7 distinct places, 1 major.

Each read must name every flaw and where it is, in a ninth of the sheet. Here the reads named flaws in 7 distinct places, 19 mentions in all across 5 reads; the number in each ninth is how many times a flaw was named there. Reads agreeing on a place strengthen the evidence for one flaw; they do not multiply it. A major flaw holds Material and surface at rung 1.

2 × WATER STAIN“small drip spots near the upper left edge”5 × WATER STAIN · MAJOR“pale drip trail and blot above the arc's inne…”2 × OTHER“scattered stray spatter and drip marks in upp…”2 × OTHER“paper crease lines crossing grey and dark mas…”3 × RING“small pale ring right of dark mass”4 × OTHER“vertical crease line through the dark mass”WHOLE SHEET · 1 × OTHERWATER STAINRINGOTHERMAJOR
GEOMETRY

Measured from the 16-bit master.

The previous engine (V22) measured this sheet's master file: 1 principal ink mass traced (cyan), 1 enclosed void at true size in its grid cells (amber), the main gesture from start to end (red). Of 14 edge segments, 36% crisp, 50% soft or bloomed, 14% broken.

A1B1C1D1E1F1A2B2C2D2E2F2A3B3C3D3E3F3H1
RULE 1Two tonal steps or fewer

Tonal depth held at rung 1.

5 steps: not applied
RULE 2A major flaw

Material held at rung 1. Mild waves in the unmounted paper are never a flaw.

1 major flaw: applied
RULE 3Any quality below 0.5

The rating cannot exceed 4.

lowest 1.6
RULE 4At least two valid reads

A read that breaks the reply format is discarded.

5 of 5 valid
THE ARITHMETIC

V23 rating 6.7.

Engine v23.8, 5 reads. Fixed arithmetic, the same for every painting; the constants were set on 24 randomly chosen paintings so the median sheet scores 5. The scale is relative to this archive, not to painting in general, and a difference of less than half a point between two paintings is noise.

MEAN RUNG2.20(2.0 + 2.2 + 3.0 + 2.2 + 1.6) ÷ 5
→
RAW5.401 + 2 × 2.20
→
RATING6.75 + 2.086 × (5.40 − 4.60)