Crucible Year Peter Yuill
Archive · full record

T_291

The work as shown. Every value below comes from vae.db, the master database of the Crucible Year.

Recorded

Date
2026.05.07, day 130
Size
97 × 180 cm
Paper
S12, Red Star Mo She Special Effect Xieyi, half-raw
Inks
MB4, MB5, MB6
Phase
P2 The Switch
Shown on the site
yes (V23 rating of 5.0 or higher)
Early storage triage
SA: save, archive (Peter's early system, since retired)

Measured · V23 (v23.8)

V23 rating
5.3
Form
2
Tonal depth
1.4
Layering
2
Composition
2
Material and surface
2
Ink cover
73%
Dark share
48%
Tonal steps
4
Flaws named by the reads
other 7
The V23 rating runs from 1 to 9, with 5 the middle of this body of work. It is the engine's reading, and the reference the archive is measured against.

Older engine

V7
7
From an earlier engine (V7). Its scale differs from V23's, so it is only ever compared with other readings by the same engine.

How the number was made

Read by the Visual Analysis Engine, version 23.8, on 2026.10.06: measured by code, then read 5 times by Claude Opus 5.5 against three reference paintings (R1 to R3), each read independent of the others. How the engine works.

WHAT THE CODE SEES

Three views of one sheet.

Left, the photograph. Centre, the tone stretch the model is shown beside it: the darkest 45% of tones spread over the whole range, so flat black, banding and stains show. Right, every pixel as the measuring code classes it: cyan black ink, deep teal translucent grey, stone the palest ink, near black bare paper.

T_291T_291, tone-stretchedT_291, classed by brightness
73%of the sheet carries ink
Black 48%Grey 44%Light 9% SHARE OF THE INK, NOT OF THE SHEET
TONAL STEPS

4 families of tone.

Every inked pixel's brightness in 64 bins, smoothed; each circled peak holds at least 4% of the ink. Life inside the black: 0.033 (under 0.045 reads as flat).

0.300.751234 BLACK INK TRANSLUCENT GREYS PALEST INK, 0.88 LUMINANCE OF EVERY INKED PIXEL, 64 BINS. PAPER (ABOVE 0.88) IS LEFT OUT.
FIVE READS

Five reads, agreeing on 4 of 5 qualities.

Each quality placed on its ladder by each read, and the mean the engine keeps. Where reads differ, they differ by one rung; close calls resolve down.

READ 1READ 2READ 3READ 4READ 5MEAN
Form2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2.0
Tonal depth1THIN2MODELLED2MODELLED1THIN1THIN1.4
Layering2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2.0
Composition2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2.0
Material and surface2SOUND2SOUND2SOUND2SOUND2SOUND2.0

READ 1, IN ITS OWN WORDS

“The sweeping dark arc is fluent and gives the composition its direction, but its interior is tonally flat. The grey layers stay legible, the left block is blunt, and paper creases are a minor surface issue. An ordinary sheet overall.”

Form · BUILT

Main arc holds its walls and follows the travel of the stroke; lower grey arc is coherent; left vertical mass is blunt and slab-like.

WEAKEST Bulky left vertical block with ragged clumped edges

STRONGEST Great dark arc following the brush's sweep

Tonal depth · THIN

Dark modulation 0.033 is flat; the main dark arc changes tone mostly at its edges. The grey arcs and dry-brush flecks add a few steps.

WEAKEST Dark arc interior nearly uniform

STRONGEST Lower grey arc with streaked graded tone

Layering · LEGIBLE

Pale grey arc passes and the left grey sweeps sit under the dark arc and stay readable at its edges; the dark pass mostly covers what lies under it.

WEAKEST Dark arc largely covers the earlier grey pass

STRONGEST Grey upper arc legible beneath dark arc

Composition · WORKING

The arc carries the eye from upper left to lower right around a shaped white void. The left vertical mass sits awkwardly at the edge.

WEAKEST Left block crowds the edge, weakly joined

STRONGEST Sweeping arc enclosing shaped white space

Material and surface · SOUND

Ink is controlled and the dry-brush flecks work. Crease lines in the paper show through the dark arc, mostly in the tone-stretched view; there are no tide lines.

WEAKEST Paper creases visible across dark arc

STRONGEST Dry-brush flecks on right of arc

FLAWS

2 distinct places, 0 major.

Each read must name every flaw and where it is, in a ninth of the sheet. Here the reads named flaws in 2 distinct places, 7 mentions in all across 5 reads; the number in each ninth is how many times a flaw was named there. Reads agreeing on a place strengthen the evidence for one flaw; they do not multiply it.

5 × OTHER“paper creases and wrinkle lines through dark …”2 × OTHER“scattered stray spatter drops on lower-left p…”OTHER
GEOMETRY

Measured from the 16-bit master.

The previous engine (V22) measured this sheet's master file: 1 principal ink mass traced (cyan), 5 enclosed voids at true size in their grid cells (amber), the main gesture from start to end (red). Of 13 edge segments, 69% crisp, 23% soft or bloomed, 8% broken.

A1B1C1D1E1F1A2B2C2D2E2F2A3B3C3D3E3F3H1H2H3H4H5
RULE 1Two tonal steps or fewer

Tonal depth held at rung 1.

4 steps: not applied
RULE 2A major flaw

Material held at rung 1. Mild waves in the unmounted paper are never a flaw.

none named
RULE 3Any quality below 0.5

The rating cannot exceed 4.

lowest 1.4
RULE 4At least two valid reads

A read that breaks the reply format is discarded.

5 of 5 valid
THE ARITHMETIC

V23 rating 5.3.

Engine v23.8, 5 reads. Fixed arithmetic, the same for every painting; the constants were set on 24 randomly chosen paintings so the median sheet scores 5. The scale is relative to this archive, not to painting in general, and a difference of less than half a point between two paintings is noise.

MEAN RUNG1.88(2.0 + 1.4 + 2.0 + 2.0 + 2.0) ÷ 5
→
RAW4.761 + 2 × 1.88
→
RATING5.35 + 2.086 × (4.76 − 4.60)