Crucible Year Peter Yuill
Archive · full record

T_294

The work as shown. Every value below comes from vae.db, the master database of the Crucible Year.

Recorded

Date
2026.05.07, day 130
Size
97 × 180 cm
Paper
S12, Red Star Mo She Special Effect Xieyi, half-raw
Inks
MB4, MB5, MB6
Phase
P2 The Switch
Shown on the site
yes (V23 rating of 5.0 or higher)
Early storage triage
SA: save, archive (Peter's early system, since retired)

Measured · V23 (v23.8)

V23 rating
5.8
Form
2
Tonal depth
2
Layering
2
Composition
2
Material and surface
2
Ink cover
77%
Dark share
47%
Tonal steps
3
Flaws named by the reads
other 10
The V23 rating runs from 1 to 9, with 5 the middle of this body of work. It is the engine's reading, and the reference the archive is measured against.

Older engine

V7
9
From an earlier engine (V7). Its scale differs from V23's, so it is only ever compared with other readings by the same engine.

How the number was made

Read by the Visual Analysis Engine, version 23.8, on 2026.10.06: measured by code, then read 5 times by Claude Opus 5.5 against three reference paintings (R1 to R3), each read independent of the others. How the engine works.

WHAT THE CODE SEES

Three views of one sheet.

Left, the photograph. Centre, the tone stretch the model is shown beside it: the darkest 45% of tones spread over the whole range, so flat black, banding and stains show. Right, every pixel as the measuring code classes it: cyan black ink, deep teal translucent grey, stone the palest ink, near black bare paper.

T_294T_294, tone-stretchedT_294, classed by brightness
77%of the sheet carries ink
Black 47%Grey 48% SHARE OF THE INK, NOT OF THE SHEET
TONAL STEPS

3 families of tone.

Every inked pixel's brightness in 64 bins, smoothed; each circled peak holds at least 4% of the ink. Life inside the black: 0.047 (under 0.045 reads as flat).

0.300.75123 BLACK INK TRANSLUCENT GREYS PALEST INK, 0.88 LUMINANCE OF EVERY INKED PIXEL, 64 BINS. PAPER (ABOVE 0.88) IS LEFT OUT.
FIVE READS

Five reads, one answer.

Each quality placed on its ladder by each read, and the mean the engine keeps.

READ 1READ 2READ 3READ 4READ 5MEAN
Form2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2.0
Tonal depth2MODELLED2MODELLED2MODELLED2MODELLED2MODELLED2.0
Layering2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2.0
Composition2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2.0
Material and surface2SOUND2SOUND2SOUND2SOUND2SOUND2.0

READ 1, IN ITS OWN WORDS

“A single sweeping arc with a dark fan over a grey band. The structure is legible, but the dark mass is near-flat and slab-like, with fewer passes than R3. An ordinary sheet overall.”

Form · BUILT

Arc forms hold and follow the curve; the central dark fan is bulky and filled in, with a squared-off left end rather than a stroke-led edge.

WEAKEST dark fan reads as a filled slab

STRONGEST outer grey arc following brush sweep

Tonal depth · MODELLED

Interior modulation 0.047 is just above flat; the dark fan shows only slight variation and creases. Grey outer arc and lower-right dry-brush give banding.

WEAKEST dark fan interior nearly uniform

STRONGEST outer grey band with streaked brush grain

Layering · LEGIBLE

Three passes are readable: pale inner arc, grey outer band, dark fan. Overlaps stay legible but don't build a sequence the way R3 does.

WEAKEST dark fan covers rather than layers

STRONGEST grey outer arc under dark fan edge

Composition · WORKING

The big arc carries the eye from left to bottom right, and the empty paper inside the arc is shaped. The left splatter zone and top-left corner are weak.

WEAKEST left splatter end feels busy and cut

STRONGEST sweeping arc enclosing shaped paper at bottom

Material and surface · SOUND

The ink is controlled, with dry-brush at lower right. Paper creases cross the dark fan and there is a small blot in the centre void; neither seriously disrupts the main mass.

WEAKEST crease network across dark mass

STRONGEST dry-brush breakup at lower right

FLAWS

2 distinct places, 0 major.

Each read must name every flaw and where it is, in a ninth of the sheet. Here the reads named flaws in 2 distinct places, 10 mentions in all across 5 reads; the number in each ninth is how many times a flaw was named there. Reads agreeing on a place strengthen the evidence for one flaw; they do not multiply it.

5 × OTHER“crease lines across dark fan interior”5 × OTHER“isolated ink blot in pale centre opening”OTHER
GEOMETRY

Measured from the 16-bit master.

The previous engine (V22) measured this sheet's master file: 1 principal ink mass traced (cyan), 7 enclosed voids at true size in their grid cells (amber), the main gesture from start to end (red). Of 15 edge segments, 33% crisp, 40% soft or bloomed, 27% broken.

A1B1C1D1E1F1A2B2C2D2E2F2A3B3C3D3E3F3H1H2H3H4H5H6H7
RULE 1Two tonal steps or fewer

Tonal depth held at rung 1.

3 steps: not applied
RULE 2A major flaw

Material held at rung 1. Mild waves in the unmounted paper are never a flaw.

none named
RULE 3Any quality below 0.5

The rating cannot exceed 4.

lowest 2.0
RULE 4At least two valid reads

A read that breaks the reply format is discarded.

5 of 5 valid
THE ARITHMETIC

V23 rating 5.8.

Engine v23.8, 5 reads. Fixed arithmetic, the same for every painting; the constants were set on 24 randomly chosen paintings so the median sheet scores 5. The scale is relative to this archive, not to painting in general, and a difference of less than half a point between two paintings is noise.

MEAN RUNG2.00(2.0 + 2.0 + 2.0 + 2.0 + 2.0) ÷ 5
→
RAW5.001 + 2 × 2.00
→
RATING5.85 + 2.086 × (5.00 − 4.60)