Crucible Year Peter Yuill
Archive · full record

T_303

The work as shown. Every value below comes from vae.db, the master database of the Crucible Year.

Recorded

Date
2026.05.14, day 137
Size
70 × 180 cm
Paper
S3, Tanxi Jing Pi, raw
Inks
MB4, MB5, MB6
Phase
P2 The Switch
Shown on the site
yes (V23 rating of 5.0 or higher)
Early storage triage
SA: save, archive (Peter's early system, since retired)

Measured · V23 (v23.8)

V23 rating
5
Form
2
Tonal depth
2
Layering
2
Composition
2
Material and surface
1
Ink cover
77%
Dark share
21%
Tonal steps
4
Flaws named by the reads
bloom 5, water stain 5, other 5
The V23 rating runs from 1 to 9, with 5 the middle of this body of work. It is the engine's reading, and the reference the archive is measured against.

Older engine

V7
8
From an earlier engine (V7). Its scale differs from V23's, so it is only ever compared with other readings by the same engine.

How the number was made

Read by the Visual Analysis Engine, version 23.8, on 2026.10.06: measured by code, then read 5 times by Claude Opus 5.5 against three reference paintings (R1 to R3), each read independent of the others. How the engine works.

WHAT THE CODE SEES

Three views of one sheet.

Left, the photograph. Centre, the tone stretch the model is shown beside it: the darkest 45% of tones spread over the whole range, so flat black, banding and stains show. Right, every pixel as the measuring code classes it: cyan black ink, deep teal translucent grey, stone the palest ink, near black bare paper.

T_303T_303, tone-stretchedT_303, classed by brightness
77%of the sheet carries ink
Black 21%Grey 71% SHARE OF THE INK, NOT OF THE SHEET
TONAL STEPS

4 families of tone.

Every inked pixel's brightness in 64 bins, smoothed; each circled peak holds at least 4% of the ink. Life inside the black: 0.048 (under 0.045 reads as flat).

0.300.751234 BLACK INK TRANSLUCENT GREYS PALEST INK, 0.88 LUMINANCE OF EVERY INKED PIXEL, 64 BINS. PAPER (ABOVE 0.88) IS LEFT OUT.
FIVE READS

Five reads, one answer.

Each quality placed on its ladder by each read, and the mean the engine keeps.

READ 1READ 2READ 3READ 4READ 5MEAN
Form2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2.0
Tonal depth2MODELLED2MODELLED2MODELLED2MODELLED2MODELLED2.0
Layering2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2.0
Composition2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2.0
Material and surface1FLAWED1FLAWED1FLAWED1FLAWED1FLAWED1.0

READ 1, IN ITS OWN WORDS

“A confident dark arc and a pale sweep give the sheet direction, but the big grey slab is bulky and mostly flat, and blooms mar its left edge. An ordinary sheet, near R2.”

Form · BUILT

Dark arcing stroke follows brush travel with split dry-brush bristle edges; large grey wash is a heavy slab with a ragged, undefined left wall.

WEAKEST Bulky grey slab spanning left and centre

STRONGEST Dark curved stroke with dry-brush tail, right-centre

Tonal depth · MODELLED

Dark mass shows bristle streaks and grading toward its lower tail (modulation 0.048, barely above flat); big grey wash is mostly even, with some vertical banding at left.

WEAKEST Grey slab interior largely flat mid-grey

STRONGEST Dark stroke's streaked, graded interior

Layering · LEGIBLE

Three passes: a grey wash, a dark stroke over it and a light arc at right. The overlaps can be read but build little depth; four tonal steps.

WEAKEST Dark stroke covers grey without much translucency

STRONGEST Pale grey arc legible over paper, right

Composition · WORKING

A clear left-to-right sweep ending in the dark head and the arc. Ink covers 77% of the sheet, so the empty paper is mostly the top-right and bottom-right corners; the left reads as dense and static.

WEAKEST Heavy grey slab crowds left half

STRONGEST Sweep from dark stroke into right arc

Material and surface · FLAWED

The left edge of the grey slab shows blotchy blooms and cloudy pooling that are visible in the colour view, with scattered drips nearby; the grey wash interior is slightly cloudy.

WEAKEST Mottled, bloomed left edge of grey wash

STRONGEST Dry-brush bristle texture in dark stroke

FLAWS

4 distinct places, 1 major.

Each read must name every flaw and where it is, in a ninth of the sheet. Here the reads named flaws in 4 distinct places, 15 mentions in all across 5 reads; the number in each ninth is how many times a flaw was named there. Reads agreeing on a place strengthen the evidence for one flaw; they do not multiply it. A major flaw holds Material and surface at rung 1.

5 × OTHER, WATER STAIN“Scattered drips and spots, top left”5 × BLOOM · MAJOR“Mottled blooming along the left edge of the l…”3 × OTHER“crease and scratch lines across grey wash and…”2 × WATER STAIN“Cloudy, uneven grey within the wash, lower le…”WATER STAINBLOOMOTHERMAJOR
GEOMETRY

Measured from the 16-bit master.

The previous engine (V22) measured this sheet's master file: 2 principal ink masses traced (cyan), 5 enclosed voids at true size in their grid cells (amber), the main gesture from start to end (red). Of 18 edge segments, 39% crisp, 50% soft or bloomed, 11% broken.

A1B1C1D1E1F1A2B2C2D2E2F2A3B3C3D3E3F3H1H2H3H4H5
RULE 1Two tonal steps or fewer

Tonal depth held at rung 1.

4 steps: not applied
RULE 2A major flaw

Material held at rung 1. Mild waves in the unmounted paper are never a flaw.

4 major flaws: applied
RULE 3Any quality below 0.5

The rating cannot exceed 4.

lowest 1.0
RULE 4At least two valid reads

A read that breaks the reply format is discarded.

5 of 5 valid
THE ARITHMETIC

V23 rating 5.0.

Engine v23.8, 5 reads. Fixed arithmetic, the same for every painting; the constants were set on 24 randomly chosen paintings so the median sheet scores 5. The scale is relative to this archive, not to painting in general, and a difference of less than half a point between two paintings is noise.

MEAN RUNG1.80(2.0 + 2.0 + 2.0 + 2.0 + 1.0) ÷ 5
→
RAW4.601 + 2 × 1.80
→
RATING5.05 + 2.086 × (4.60 − 4.60)