T_420
Kept in the archive, not shown. Every value below comes from vae.db, the master database of the Crucible Year.
Recorded
- Date
- 2026.11.03, day 310
- Size
- 97 × 180 cm
- Paper
- S14, Half-Cooked Red Star Mo She 6-Foot Bark Xuan Paper, self-sized
- Inks
- MB6, MB8, MB9, MB10
- Phase
- P4 S14
- Shown on the site
- no (combined score under 5.0)
The combined score
- Combined score
- 6.36
- Read half
- 33.5
- Measured half
- 30.1
The rating shown on a work page, out of 10: V23's rating times 5, plus V24's twelve tests of 50, divided by 10. 5.0 on it decides what the site shows, and it is read here at two decimals for that reason. How it is built.
Read · V23 (v23.13)
- V23 rating
- 6.7
- Form
- 3
- Tonal depth
- 2
- Layering
- 3
- Composition
- 2
- Material and surface
- 1
- Ink cover
- 86%
- Dark share
- 1%
- Tonal steps
- 3
- Flaws named by the reads
- other 21, water stain 8
The V23 rating runs from 1 to 9, with 5 the middle of this body of work. It is the model's reading held by code's rules, and the read half of the combined score. Where Peter reviewed a run, this is the reviewed figure.
Measured · V24, from the 16-bit TIFF
- Mass
- 6.7 of 10
- Tone
- 4.2 of 14
- Void
- 8 of 8
- Flow
- 4.8 of 10
- Balance
- 6.4 of 8
- Measured half
- 30.1 of 50
- Mass width in mm
- rung 4 of 5
- Mass width against the sheet
- rung 3 of 5
- Evenness of that width
- rung 3 of 5
- Depth of the darks
- rung 0 of 5
- Black plateau
- rung 1 of 5
- Step from mid to dark
- rung 0 of 5
- Evenness inside the darks
- rung 5 of 5
- Spread across tonal bands
- rung 4 of 5
- Voids gathered, not scattered
- rung 5 of 5
- Directions across the sheet
- rung 2 of 5
- Local gesture and edge
- rung 3 of 5
- Balance on the sheet
- rung 4 of 5
- Mass width
- 126 mm
- Depth of the darks (p75 density)
- 0.86
- Largest void, radius
- 220 mm
- Direction alignment
- 0.29
- Left and right asymmetry
- 0.49
- Resolution
- 3.85 px per mm
Twelve deterministic tests with no model and no votes. They track physical change across the year and cannot see a mark's quality, so they are no verdict on one work. The tests and their limits.