Crucible Year Peter Yuill
Archive · full record

T_148

The work as shown. Every value below comes from vae.db, the master database of the Crucible Year.

Recorded

Date
2026.03.27, day 89
Size
70 × 180 cm
Paper
S3, Tanxi Jing Pi, raw
Inks
MB1, MB2, MB3
Phase
P1 Warm-up
Shown on the site
yes (V23 rating of 5.0 or higher)
Early storage triage
PT: probably trash (Peter's early system, since retired)

Measured · V23 (v23.8)

V23 rating
5.2
Form
2
Tonal depth
2.2
Layering
2
Composition
2
Material and surface
1
Ink cover
87%
Dark share
50%
Tonal steps
3
Flaws named by the reads
ring 10, other 7, water stain 3
The V23 rating runs from 1 to 9, with 5 the middle of this body of work. It is the engine's reading, and the reference the archive is measured against.

Older engine

V7
8
From an earlier engine (V7). Its scale differs from V23's, so it is only ever compared with other readings by the same engine.

How the number was made

Read by the Visual Analysis Engine, version 23.8, on 2026.10.06: measured by code, then read 5 times by Claude Opus 5.5 against three reference paintings (R1 to R3), each read independent of the others. How the engine works.

WHAT THE CODE SEES

Three views of one sheet.

Left, the photograph. Centre, the tone stretch the model is shown beside it: the darkest 45% of tones spread over the whole range, so flat black, banding and stains show. Right, every pixel as the measuring code classes it: cyan black ink, deep teal translucent grey, stone the palest ink, near black bare paper.

T_148T_148, tone-stretchedT_148, classed by brightness
87%of the sheet carries ink
Black 50%Grey 36%Light 14% SHARE OF THE INK, NOT OF THE SHEET
TONAL STEPS

3 families of tone.

Every inked pixel's brightness in 64 bins, smoothed; each circled peak holds at least 4% of the ink. Life inside the black: 0.072 (under 0.045 reads as flat).

0.300.75123 BLACK INK TRANSLUCENT GREYS PALEST INK, 0.88 LUMINANCE OF EVERY INKED PIXEL, 64 BINS. PAPER (ABOVE 0.88) IS LEFT OUT.
FIVE READS

Five reads, agreeing on 4 of 5 qualities.

Each quality placed on its ladder by each read, and the mean the engine keeps. Where reads differ, they differ by one rung; close calls resolve down.

READ 1READ 2READ 3READ 4READ 5MEAN
Form2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2.0
Tonal depth2MODELLED2MODELLED2MODELLED2MODELLED3DEEP2.2
Layering2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2.0
Composition2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2.0
Material and surface1FLAWED1FLAWED1FLAWED1FLAWED1FLAWED1.0

READ 1, IN ITS OWN WORDS

“One bold sweeping arc over a grey fan gives the sheet direction, with some banding inside the dark. It is bulky and crowded, and visible rings at bottom left and blots along the top weaken the surface.”

Form · BUILT

The main dark arc follows the brush's travel and its walls hold, but it is a bulky slab. Its squared right end is stiff, and the top blots are formless.

WEAKEST Scattered blots and drips along the top edge

STRONGEST Main curved sweep from left to the right end

Tonal depth · MODELLED

Pale striations and grain run inside the band (modulation 0.072). Three tonal steps. The densest black at the right end reads mostly as flat surface.

WEAKEST Darkest right end of the band is nearly flat

STRONGEST Banded mid-section of the arc with striations

Layering · LEGIBLE

The translucent grey fan steps sit under the dark arc and stay readable at its upper edge. In effect there are two passes, with no deeper sequence.

WEAKEST Dark pass mostly covers the grey fan beneath

STRONGEST Grey fan layers behind the dark arc, upper left

Composition · WORKING

One strong curve gives the sheet direction. The white lens of paper at upper left is shaped, but 87% ink coverage crowds the frame, and the blots along the top edge distract.

WEAKEST Top-edge blots clutter the empty paper

STRONGEST Sweeping arc carrying the eye left to right

Material and surface · FLAWED

Clear circular rings sit inside the grey-dark band at bottom left and in the pale fan, all visible in the colour view. Scattered drip blots line the top edge.

WEAKEST Ring marks inside the band at bottom left

STRONGEST Grainy striated interior of the dark arc

FLAWS

6 distinct places, 2 major.

Each read must name every flaw and where it is, in a ninth of the sheet. Here the reads named flaws in 6 distinct places, 20 mentions in all across 5 reads; the number in each ninth is how many times a flaw was named there. Reads agreeing on a place strengthen the evidence for one flaw; they do not multiply it. A major flaw holds Material and surface at rung 1.

4 × RING“Small rings in the pale grey fan”5 × OTHER“Drip blots along the top edge”3 × RING, WATER STAIN · MAJOR“small rings in pale grey strokes upper left”3 × WATER STAIN, OTHER“Vertical pale streak crossing the band”4 × RING · MAJOR“Circular rings inside the band at the lower l…”1 × OTHER“Vertical pale streak or fold crossing the band”WATER STAINRINGOTHERMAJOR
GEOMETRY

Measured from the 16-bit master.

The previous engine (V22) measured this sheet's master file: 4 principal ink masses traced (cyan), 3 enclosed voids at true size in their grid cells (amber), the main gesture from start to end (red). Of 19 edge segments, 16% crisp, 84% soft or bloomed, 0% broken.

A1B1C1D1E1F1A2B2C2D2E2F2A3B3C3D3E3F3H1H2H3
RULE 1Two tonal steps or fewer

Tonal depth held at rung 1.

3 steps: not applied
RULE 2A major flaw

Material held at rung 1. Mild waves in the unmounted paper are never a flaw.

5 major flaws: applied
RULE 3Any quality below 0.5

The rating cannot exceed 4.

lowest 1.0
RULE 4At least two valid reads

A read that breaks the reply format is discarded.

5 of 5 valid
THE ARITHMETIC

V23 rating 5.2.

Engine v23.8, 5 reads. Fixed arithmetic, the same for every painting; the constants were set on 24 randomly chosen paintings so the median sheet scores 5. The scale is relative to this archive, not to painting in general, and a difference of less than half a point between two paintings is noise.

MEAN RUNG1.84(2.0 + 2.2 + 2.0 + 2.0 + 1.0) ÷ 5
→
RAW4.681 + 2 × 1.84
→
RATING5.25 + 2.086 × (4.68 − 4.60)