Crucible Year Peter Yuill
Archive · full record

T_159

The work as shown. Every value below comes from vae.db, the master database of the Crucible Year.

Recorded

Date
2026.03.28, day 90
Size
70 × 180 cm
Paper
S3, Tanxi Jing Pi, raw
Inks
MB1, MB2, MB3
Phase
P1 Warm-up
Shown on the site
yes (V23 rating of 5.0 or higher)
Early storage triage
SA: save, archive (Peter's early system, since retired)

Measured · V23 (v23.8)

V23 rating
5
Form
2
Tonal depth
2
Layering
2
Composition
2
Material and surface
1
Ink cover
76%
Dark share
35%
Tonal steps
7
Flaws named by the reads
bloom 3, ring 6, water stain 7, other 2, tide line 2
The V23 rating runs from 1 to 9, with 5 the middle of this body of work. It is the engine's reading, and the reference the archive is measured against.

Older engine

V7
9
From an earlier engine (V7). Its scale differs from V23's, so it is only ever compared with other readings by the same engine.

How the number was made

Read by the Visual Analysis Engine, version 23.8, on 2026.10.06: measured by code, then read 5 times by Claude Opus 5.5 against three reference paintings (R1 to R3), each read independent of the others. How the engine works.

WHAT THE CODE SEES

Three views of one sheet.

Left, the photograph. Centre, the tone stretch the model is shown beside it: the darkest 45% of tones spread over the whole range, so flat black, banding and stains show. Right, every pixel as the measuring code classes it: cyan black ink, deep teal translucent grey, stone the palest ink, near black bare paper.

T_159T_159, tone-stretchedT_159, classed by brightness
76%of the sheet carries ink
Black 35%Grey 48%Light 17% SHARE OF THE INK, NOT OF THE SHEET
TONAL STEPS

7 families of tone.

Every inked pixel's brightness in 64 bins, smoothed; each circled peak holds at least 4% of the ink. Life inside the black: 0.063 (under 0.045 reads as flat).

0.300.751234567 BLACK INK TRANSLUCENT GREYS PALEST INK, 0.88 LUMINANCE OF EVERY INKED PIXEL, 64 BINS. PAPER (ABOVE 0.88) IS LEFT OUT.
FIVE READS

Five reads, one answer.

Each quality placed on its ladder by each read, and the mean the engine keeps.

READ 1READ 2READ 3READ 4READ 5MEAN
Form2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2.0
Tonal depth2MODELLED2MODELLED2MODELLED2MODELLED2MODELLED2.0
Layering2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2.0
Composition2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2.0
Material and surface1FLAWED1FLAWED1FLAWED1FLAWED1FLAWED1.0

READ 1, IN ITS OWN WORDS

“An ordinary sheet. A strong sweeping arc with good dry-brush and grained tone is let down by a weak, bloomed right crescent and by water rings in the grey wash.”

Form · BUILT

The left arc follows the brush's travel, ending in fluent dry-brush streaks. The left end is bulky and slab-like. The right crescent's edges are blotchy, not fully made.

WEAKEST Right crescent: blotchy, its walls dissolve into mottling

STRONGEST Main sweeping arc with dry-brush tail

Tonal depth · MODELLED

Seven tonal steps and dark modulation of 0.063. The arc shows grain, cracks and graded density. The far-left dark mass is fairly flat. The right crescent is mottled rather than modelled.

WEAKEST Lower-left black end of arc is fairly uniform

STRONGEST Arc body grading from black to grain-streaked grey

Layering · LEGIBLE

There is a grey ground wash, a dark arc pass, dry-brush overstrokes and the right crescent. These overlaps can be read at centre, but the sequence doesn't build much depth.

WEAKEST The black arc mostly covers the grey wash beneath

STRONGEST Dry-brush streaks crossing the pale grey wash at centre

Composition · WORKING

The big arc gives strong left-to-right movement and shapes the white oval. The right-hand crescent echoes the curve, but the gap of grey wash at centre-right feels slack.

WEAKEST The right crescent sits isolated and is weakly tied in

STRONGEST Large arc enclosing the shaped white oval upper-left

Material and surface · FLAWED

The right crescent's interior is full of bloom rings and blotches. There are tide rings in the grey wash at centre-right and pale stain splotches in the white oval, all visible in the colour view.

WEAKEST Bloomed, ringed interior of right crescent

STRONGEST Dry-brush streak edges of the arc's tail

FLAWS

6 distinct places, 2 major.

Each read must name every flaw and where it is, in a ninth of the sheet. Here the reads named flaws in 6 distinct places, 20 mentions in all across 5 reads; the number in each ninth is how many times a flaw was named there. Reads agreeing on a place strengthen the evidence for one flaw; they do not multiply it. A major flaw holds Material and surface at rung 1.

5 × WATER STAIN · MAJOR“pale grey splotches in the white oval”2 × TIDE LINE, WATER STAIN“cloudy edges in the pale wash at upper centre”2 × TIDE LINE, BLOOM“cloudy tide marks in the grey wash, upper cen…”4 × RING, OTHER, WATER STAIN“pale circular mark in the left black mass”1 × RING“circular tide rings in grey wash centre-right”6 × BLOOM, OTHER, RING · MAJOR“interior of right crescent mass, ringed blotc…”WATER STAINBLOOMRINGTIDE LINEOTHERMAJOR
GEOMETRY

Measured from the 16-bit master.

The previous engine (V22) measured this sheet's master file: 2 principal ink masses traced (cyan), 7 enclosed voids at true size in their grid cells (amber), the main gesture from start to end (red). Of 17 edge segments, 29% crisp, 59% soft or bloomed, 12% broken.

A1B1C1D1E1F1A2B2C2D2E2F2A3B3C3D3E3F3H1H2H3H4H5H6H7
RULE 1Two tonal steps or fewer

Tonal depth held at rung 1.

7 steps: not applied
RULE 2A major flaw

Material held at rung 1. Mild waves in the unmounted paper are never a flaw.

6 major flaws: applied
RULE 3Any quality below 0.5

The rating cannot exceed 4.

lowest 1.0
RULE 4At least two valid reads

A read that breaks the reply format is discarded.

5 of 5 valid
THE ARITHMETIC

V23 rating 5.0.

Engine v23.8, 5 reads. Fixed arithmetic, the same for every painting; the constants were set on 24 randomly chosen paintings so the median sheet scores 5. The scale is relative to this archive, not to painting in general, and a difference of less than half a point between two paintings is noise.

MEAN RUNG1.80(2.0 + 2.0 + 2.0 + 2.0 + 1.0) ÷ 5
→
RAW4.601 + 2 × 1.80
→
RATING5.05 + 2.086 × (4.60 − 4.60)