Crucible Year Peter Yuill
Archive · full record

T_227

The work as shown. Every value below comes from vae.db, the master database of the Crucible Year.

Recorded

Date
2026.04.15, day 108
Size
97 × 180 cm
Paper
S11, Red Star Mo She Special Effect Xieyi, raw
Inks
MB4, MB5, MB6
Phase
P2 The Switch
Shown on the site
yes (V23 rating of 5.0 or higher)
Early storage triage
SA: save, archive (Peter's early system, since retired)

Measured · V23 (v23.8)

V23 rating
5.3
Form
2
Tonal depth
2
Layering
2
Composition
2
Material and surface
1.4
Ink cover
82%
Dark share
20%
Tonal steps
5
Flaws named by the reads
tide line 3, water stain 6, other 4, ring 1
The V23 rating runs from 1 to 9, with 5 the middle of this body of work. It is the engine's reading, and the reference the archive is measured against.

Older engine

V7
8
From an earlier engine (V7). Its scale differs from V23's, so it is only ever compared with other readings by the same engine.

How the number was made

Read by the Visual Analysis Engine, version 23.8, on 2026.10.06: measured by code, then read 5 times by Claude Opus 5.5 against three reference paintings (R1 to R3), each read independent of the others. How the engine works.

WHAT THE CODE SEES

Three views of one sheet.

Left, the photograph. Centre, the tone stretch the model is shown beside it: the darkest 45% of tones spread over the whole range, so flat black, banding and stains show. Right, every pixel as the measuring code classes it: cyan black ink, deep teal translucent grey, stone the palest ink, near black bare paper.

T_227T_227, tone-stretchedT_227, classed by brightness
82%of the sheet carries ink
Black 20%Grey 49%Light 31% SHARE OF THE INK, NOT OF THE SHEET
TONAL STEPS

5 families of tone.

Every inked pixel's brightness in 64 bins, smoothed; each circled peak holds at least 4% of the ink. Life inside the black: 0.047 (under 0.045 reads as flat).

0.300.7512345 BLACK INK TRANSLUCENT GREYS PALEST INK, 0.88 LUMINANCE OF EVERY INKED PIXEL, 64 BINS. PAPER (ABOVE 0.88) IS LEFT OUT.
FIVE READS

Five reads, agreeing on 4 of 5 qualities.

Each quality placed on its ladder by each read, and the mean the engine keeps. Where reads differ, they differ by one rung; close calls resolve down.

READ 1READ 2READ 3READ 4READ 5MEAN
Form2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2.0
Tonal depth2MODELLED2MODELLED2MODELLED2MODELLED2MODELLED2.0
Layering2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2.0
Composition2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2.0
Material and surface1FLAWED1FLAWED2SOUND2SOUND1FLAWED1.4

READ 1, IN ITS OWN WORDS

“An energetic circular gesture sheet like R2. The lower dry-brush crescent is the best part. It is held back by solid black blots, cloudy tide-edged grey washes in the centre and crowded spatter.”

Form · BUILT

The lower curved sweep and the arcing grey strokes follow the travel of the brush; the top-centre black blob and right blot are bulky lobes.

WEAKEST Right-edge black blot, a shapeless dropped lobe

STRONGEST Lower centre sweeping crescent of dry-brush strokes

Tonal depth · MODELLED

Five tonal steps and modulation of 0.047, just above flat. Arcs are banded and grainy; the right and top blots are dead black.

WEAKEST Right blot is flat solid black inside

STRONGEST Lower crescent with banded dry-brush grain

Layering · LEGIBLE

A pale grey arc pass, mid-grey rectangular washes and the dark sweeps can each be read, though the centre stacks get dense and cloudy.

WEAKEST Centre overlaps grow cloudy where the greys pile up

STRONGEST Pale left arc under the darker central sweep

Composition · WORKING

The circular sweep sets up movement from the left arc into the lower crescent. Ink covers 82% of the sheet, so the paper is crowded and spatter clutters it.

WEAKEST Busy, crowded centre and spattered upper left

STRONGEST Large circular rotation sweeping across the sheet

Material and surface · FLAWED

Milky, cloudy grey wash patches with hard tide edges sit around the central dark masses. Scattered blotches and crease lines show in the colour view.

WEAKEST Cloudy grey washes with tide edges in the centre

STRONGEST Dry-brush grain in the lower sweep

FLAWS

3 distinct places, 2 major.

Each read must name every flaw and where it is, in a ninth of the sheet. Here the reads named flaws in 3 distinct places, 14 mentions in all across 5 reads; the number in each ninth is how many times a flaw was named there. Reads agreeing on a place strengthen the evidence for one flaw; they do not multiply it. A major flaw holds Material and surface at rung 1.

4 × WATER STAIN, RING, TIDE LINE“pale blotchy drops and stains across the uppe…”4 × WATER STAIN · MAJOR“cloudy grey patch at the upper centre”6 × TIDE LINE, OTHER · MAJOR“hard edges of the grey wash around the centra…”WATER STAINRINGTIDE LINEOTHERMAJOR
GEOMETRY

Measured from the 16-bit master.

The previous engine (V22) measured this sheet's master file: 2 principal ink masses traced (cyan), 9 enclosed voids at true size in their grid cells (amber), the main gesture from start to end (red). Of 14 edge segments, 79% crisp, 14% soft or bloomed, 7% broken.

A1B1C1D1E1F1A2B2C2D2E2F2A3B3C3D3E3F3H1H2H3H4H5H6H7H8H9
RULE 1Two tonal steps or fewer

Tonal depth held at rung 1.

5 steps: not applied
RULE 2A major flaw

Material held at rung 1. Mild waves in the unmounted paper are never a flaw.

3 major flaws: applied
RULE 3Any quality below 0.5

The rating cannot exceed 4.

lowest 1.4
RULE 4At least two valid reads

A read that breaks the reply format is discarded.

5 of 5 valid
THE ARITHMETIC

V23 rating 5.3.

Engine v23.8, 5 reads. Fixed arithmetic, the same for every painting; the constants were set on 24 randomly chosen paintings so the median sheet scores 5. The scale is relative to this archive, not to painting in general, and a difference of less than half a point between two paintings is noise.

MEAN RUNG1.88(2.0 + 2.0 + 2.0 + 2.0 + 1.4) ÷ 5
→
RAW4.761 + 2 × 1.88
→
RATING5.35 + 2.086 × (4.76 − 4.60)