Crucible Year Peter Yuill
Archive · full record

T_254

The work as shown. Every value below comes from vae.db, the master database of the Crucible Year.

Recorded

Date
2026.04.21, day 114
Size
70 × 180 cm
Paper
S3, Tanxi Jing Pi, raw
Inks
MB4, MB5, MB6
Phase
P2 The Switch
Shown on the site
yes (V23 rating of 5.0 or higher)
Early storage triage
SA: save, archive (Peter's early system, since retired)

Measured · V23 (v23.8)

V23 rating
5
Form
2
Tonal depth
2
Layering
2
Composition
2
Material and surface
1
Ink cover
75%
Dark share
41%
Tonal steps
5
Flaws named by the reads
other 10, tide line 4, water stain 4
The V23 rating runs from 1 to 9, with 5 the middle of this body of work. It is the engine's reading, and the reference the archive is measured against.

Older engine

V7
6
From an earlier engine (V7). Its scale differs from V23's, so it is only ever compared with other readings by the same engine.

How the number was made

Read by the Visual Analysis Engine, version 23.8, on 2026.10.06: measured by code, then read 5 times by Claude Opus 5.5 against three reference paintings (R1 to R3), each read independent of the others. How the engine works.

WHAT THE CODE SEES

Three views of one sheet.

Left, the photograph. Centre, the tone stretch the model is shown beside it: the darkest 45% of tones spread over the whole range, so flat black, banding and stains show. Right, every pixel as the measuring code classes it: cyan black ink, deep teal translucent grey, stone the palest ink, near black bare paper.

T_254T_254, tone-stretchedT_254, classed by brightness
75%of the sheet carries ink
Black 41%Grey 43%Light 16% SHARE OF THE INK, NOT OF THE SHEET
TONAL STEPS

5 families of tone.

Every inked pixel's brightness in 64 bins, smoothed; each circled peak holds at least 4% of the ink. Life inside the black: 0.071 (under 0.045 reads as flat).

0.300.7512345 BLACK INK TRANSLUCENT GREYS PALEST INK, 0.88 LUMINANCE OF EVERY INKED PIXEL, 64 BINS. PAPER (ABOVE 0.88) IS LEFT OUT.
FIVE READS

Five reads, one answer.

Each quality placed on its ladder by each read, and the mean the engine keeps.

READ 1READ 2READ 3READ 4READ 5MEAN
Form2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2.0
Tonal depth2MODELLED2MODELLED2MODELLED2MODELLED2MODELLED2.0
Layering2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2.0
Composition2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2.0
Material and surface1FLAWED1FLAWED1FLAWED1FLAWED1FLAWED1.0

READ 1, IN ITS OWN WORDS

“A broad bowl arc with a heavy black slab at left. The forms and layering work at an ordinary level. The left black is flat inside, and a white hole and cloudy wash edges weaken the surface.”

Form · BUILT

Left black slab is a curved block with a bristle-trailed edge; the right arc follows the brush's travel; the centre grey wash is bulky and loosely bounded.

WEAKEST Bulky grey wash mass, centre-left, ragged and slab-like

STRONGEST Right arc sweep with dry-brush trailing strokes

Tonal depth · MODELLED

Five tonal steps; modulation 0.071. The right arc and centre grey show graded texture, but the left black block reads mostly uniform inside.

WEAKEST Left black slab interior largely flat

STRONGEST Right arc greys with grain and wrinkle texture

Layering · LEGIBLE

Pale wash, mid-grey, and black passes stay distinct; the dark streaks at bottom right sit legibly over grey; the black slab mostly covers what lies beneath it.

WEAKEST Black slab covers earlier grey at left

STRONGEST Grey wash under dark stroke, bottom-centre arc

Composition · WORKING

A large U-shaped arc carries the eye from the left block to the upper right and shapes the empty oval; the left side is heavy and blocky.

WEAKEST Heavy left block crowds left edge

STRONGEST Sweeping bowl arc enclosing open paper

Material and surface · FLAWED

A white void sits in the bottom-centre grey mass; wrinkled, cloudy wash and tide edges in the right arc; a drip blob at centre; a hair-line crack in the left black.

WEAKEST White paper hole/blot in bottom grey wash

STRONGEST Dry-brush bristle edges at lower left

FLAWS

6 distinct places, 2 major.

Each read must name every flaw and where it is, in a ninth of the sheet. Here the reads named flaws in 6 distinct places, 18 mentions in all across 5 reads; the number in each ninth is how many times a flaw was named there. Reads agreeing on a place strengthen the evidence for one flaw; they do not multiply it. A major flaw holds Material and surface at rung 1.

1 × OTHER“scattered drops and specks in the open paper”2 × OTHER, WATER STAIN“thin crack lines across the left black slab”5 × WATER STAIN, OTHER“drip blob and puddle at end of centre stroke”1 × TIDE LINE“mottled reticulated tide marks in right grey …”5 × OTHER · MAJOR“white unpainted hole inside bottom grey wash”4 × TIDE LINE, WATER STAIN · MAJOR“wrinkled cloudy wash edges in right arc”WATER STAINTIDE LINEOTHERMAJOR
GEOMETRY

Measured from the 16-bit master.

The previous engine (V22) measured this sheet's master file: 1 principal ink mass traced (cyan), 2 enclosed voids at true size in their grid cells (amber), the main gesture from start to end (red). Of 15 edge segments, 33% crisp, 33% soft or bloomed, 33% broken.

A1B1C1D1E1F1A2B2C2D2E2F2A3B3C3D3E3F3H1H2
RULE 1Two tonal steps or fewer

Tonal depth held at rung 1.

5 steps: not applied
RULE 2A major flaw

Material held at rung 1. Mild waves in the unmounted paper are never a flaw.

3 major flaws: applied
RULE 3Any quality below 0.5

The rating cannot exceed 4.

lowest 1.0
RULE 4At least two valid reads

A read that breaks the reply format is discarded.

5 of 5 valid
THE ARITHMETIC

V23 rating 5.0.

Engine v23.8, 5 reads. Fixed arithmetic, the same for every painting; the constants were set on 24 randomly chosen paintings so the median sheet scores 5. The scale is relative to this archive, not to painting in general, and a difference of less than half a point between two paintings is noise.

MEAN RUNG1.80(2.0 + 2.0 + 2.0 + 2.0 + 1.0) ÷ 5
→
RAW4.601 + 2 × 1.80
→
RATING5.05 + 2.086 × (4.60 − 4.60)