Crucible Year Peter Yuill
Archive · full record

T_308

The work as shown. Every value below comes from vae.db, the master database of the Crucible Year.

Recorded

Date
2026.05.14, day 137
Size
70 × 180 cm
Paper
S3, Tanxi Jing Pi, raw
Inks
MB4, MB5, MB6
Phase
P2 The Switch
Shown on the site
yes (V23 rating of 5.0 or higher)
Early storage triage
SA: save, archive (Peter's early system, since retired)

Measured · V23 (v23.8)

V23 rating
5.8
Form
2
Tonal depth
2
Layering
2
Composition
2
Material and surface
2
Ink cover
68%
Dark share
27%
Tonal steps
5
Flaws named by the reads
bloom 6, other 1, ring 3
The V23 rating runs from 1 to 9, with 5 the middle of this body of work. It is the engine's reading, and the reference the archive is measured against.

Older engine

V7
8
From an earlier engine (V7). Its scale differs from V23's, so it is only ever compared with other readings by the same engine.

How the number was made

Read by the Visual Analysis Engine, version 23.8, on 2026.10.06: measured by code, then read 5 times by Claude Opus 5.5 against three reference paintings (R1 to R3), each read independent of the others. How the engine works.

WHAT THE CODE SEES

Three views of one sheet.

Left, the photograph. Centre, the tone stretch the model is shown beside it: the darkest 45% of tones spread over the whole range, so flat black, banding and stains show. Right, every pixel as the measuring code classes it: cyan black ink, deep teal translucent grey, stone the palest ink, near black bare paper.

T_308T_308, tone-stretchedT_308, classed by brightness
68%of the sheet carries ink
Black 27%Grey 56%Light 17% SHARE OF THE INK, NOT OF THE SHEET
TONAL STEPS

5 families of tone.

Every inked pixel's brightness in 64 bins, smoothed; each circled peak holds at least 4% of the ink. Life inside the black: 0.047 (under 0.045 reads as flat).

0.300.7512345 BLACK INK TRANSLUCENT GREYS PALEST INK, 0.88 LUMINANCE OF EVERY INKED PIXEL, 64 BINS. PAPER (ABOVE 0.88) IS LEFT OUT.
FIVE READS

Five reads, one answer.

Each quality placed on its ladder by each read, and the mean the engine keeps.

READ 1READ 2READ 3READ 4READ 5MEAN
Form2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2.0
Tonal depth2MODELLED2MODELLED2MODELLED2MODELLED2MODELLED2.0
Layering2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2.0
Composition2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2WORKING2.0
Material and surface2SOUND2SOUND2SOUND2SOUND2SOUND2.0

READ 1, IN ITS OWN WORDS

“An ordinary gestural sheet close to R2. The sweeping dry-brush arc gives flow and modelled greys, but the left dark mass and the right blob are bulky and fairly flat. One soft bleed sits near the top right.”

Form · BUILT

The central swinging arc is fluent, with its outline following the stroke. The left dark mass is bulky and lobed, and the right-centre blob is a lump.

WEAKEST Right-centre round dark blob, lumpy and unshaped

STRONGEST Central grey arc following the brush's sweep

Tonal depth · MODELLED

The arc has streaked, stepped greys and the left mass shows some density shifts. The right blob and the top-right dark are fairly flat. Modulation 0.047 is barely above flat.

WEAKEST Right-centre dark blob, flat inside

STRONGEST Dry-brush graded greys in the central arc

Layering · LEGIBLE

Two or three passes: the grey arc goes down first, then the dark masses and spatter. The overlaps on the right stay legible, but the left dark mostly hides what lies beneath it.

WEAKEST Left dark mass covers the earlier grey

STRONGEST Dark marks laid over the grey arc on the right

Composition · WORKING

A U-shaped sweep carries the eye from left to right, and the paper above the arc is shaped. The left mass is congested and the right cluster is scattered.

WEAKEST Crowded, heavy left mass

STRONGEST Arc spanning the sheet, linking the left and right masses

Material and surface · SOUND

The ink is controlled and the dry-brush streaks are well used. There is a soft bleed halo at the top of the right arc, and pale cloudy spatter at the far left.

WEAKEST Diffuse halo at the dark spot, top centre-right

STRONGEST Dry-brush texture in the arc

FLAWS

5 distinct places, 0 major.

Each read must name every flaw and where it is, in a ninth of the sheet. Here the reads named flaws in 5 distinct places, 10 mentions in all across 5 reads; the number in each ninth is how many times a flaw was named there. Reads agreeing on a place strengthen the evidence for one flaw; they do not multiply it.

3 × BLOOM“soft halo around the dark spot at the top of …”1 × BLOOM“soft bleed halos around the edges of the left…”1 × RING“ringed drop marks to the right”3 × OTHER, BLOOM“pale cloudy grey spatter below the left dark …”2 × RING“pale ringed drops at lower right”BLOOMRINGOTHER
GEOMETRY

Measured from the 16-bit master.

The previous engine (V22) measured this sheet's master file: 3 principal ink masses traced (cyan), 12 enclosed voids at true size in their grid cells (amber), the main gesture from start to end (red). Of 21 edge segments, 19% crisp, 48% soft or bloomed, 33% broken.

A1B1C1D1E1F1A2B2C2D2E2F2A3B3C3D3E3F3H1H2H3H4H5H6H7H8H9H10H11H12
RULE 1Two tonal steps or fewer

Tonal depth held at rung 1.

5 steps: not applied
RULE 2A major flaw

Material held at rung 1. Mild waves in the unmounted paper are never a flaw.

none named
RULE 3Any quality below 0.5

The rating cannot exceed 4.

lowest 2.0
RULE 4At least two valid reads

A read that breaks the reply format is discarded.

5 of 5 valid
THE ARITHMETIC

V23 rating 5.8.

Engine v23.8, 5 reads. Fixed arithmetic, the same for every painting; the constants were set on 24 randomly chosen paintings so the median sheet scores 5. The scale is relative to this archive, not to painting in general, and a difference of less than half a point between two paintings is noise.

MEAN RUNG2.00(2.0 + 2.0 + 2.0 + 2.0 + 2.0) ÷ 5
→
RAW5.001 + 2 × 2.00
→
RATING5.85 + 2.086 × (5.00 − 4.60)