Crucible Year Peter Yuill
Archive · full record

T_412

The work as shown. Every value below comes from vae.db, the master database of the Crucible Year.

Recorded

Date
2026.11.03, day 310
Size
97 × 180 cm
Paper
S14, Half-Cooked Red Star Mo She 6-Foot Bark Xuan Paper, self-sized
Inks
MB6, MB8, MB9, MB10
Phase
P4 S14
Shown on the site
yes (combined score of 5.0 or more)

The combined score

Combined score
6.14
Read half
30
Measured half
31.4
The rating shown on a work page, out of 10: V23's rating times 5, plus V24's twelve tests of 50, divided by 10. 5.0 on it decides what the site shows, and it is read here at two decimals for that reason. How it is built.

Read · V23 (v23.13)

V23 rating
6
Form
2
Tonal depth
1.8
Layering
2.2
Composition
2.2
Material and surface
2
Ink cover
76%
Dark share
67%
Tonal steps
3
Flaws named by the reads
other 16, water stain 3, tide line 4, ring 2
The V23 rating runs from 1 to 9, with 5 the middle of this body of work. It is the model's reading held by code's rules, and the read half of the combined score. Where Peter reviewed a run, this is the reviewed figure.

Measured · V24, from the 16-bit TIFF

Mass
9.4 of 10
Tone
10.4 of 14
Void
6.4 of 8
Flow
5.2 of 10
Balance
0 of 8
Measured half
31.4 of 50
Mass width in mm
rung 5 of 5
Mass width against the sheet
rung 5 of 5
Evenness of that width
rung 4 of 5
Depth of the darks
rung 4 of 5
Black plateau
rung 4 of 5
Step from mid to dark
rung 3 of 5
Evenness inside the darks
rung 4 of 5
Spread across tonal bands
rung 3 of 5
Voids gathered, not scattered
rung 4 of 5
Directions across the sheet
rung 1 of 5
Local gesture and edge
rung 5 of 5
Balance on the sheet
rung 0 of 5
Mass width
281 mm
Depth of the darks (p75 density)
1.79
Largest void, radius
220 mm
Direction alignment
0.40
Left and right asymmetry
1.26
Resolution
3.91 px per mm
Twelve deterministic tests with no model and no votes. They track physical change across the year and cannot see a mark's quality, so they are no verdict on one work. The tests and their limits.

How the number was made

Read by the Visual Analysis Engine, version 23.13, on 2026.11.03: measured by code, then read 5 times by Claude Opus 5.5 against three reference paintings (R1 to R3), each read independent of the others. How the engine works.

WHAT THE CODE SEES

Three views of one sheet.

Left, the photograph. Centre, the tone stretch the model is shown beside it: the darkest 45% of tones spread over the whole range, so flat black, banding and stains show. Right, every pixel as the measuring code classes it: cyan black ink, deep teal translucent grey, stone the palest ink, near black bare paper.

T_412T_412, tone-stretchedT_412, classed by brightness
76%of the sheet carries ink
Black 67%Grey 21%Light 12% SHARE OF THE INK, NOT OF THE SHEET
TONAL STEPS

3 families of tone.

Every inked pixel's brightness in 64 bins, smoothed; each circled peak holds at least 4% of the ink. Life inside the black: 0.054 (under 0.045 reads as flat).

0.300.75123 BLACK INK TRANSLUCENT GREYS PALEST INK, 0.88 LUMINANCE OF EVERY INKED PIXEL, 64 BINS. PAPER (ABOVE 0.88) IS LEFT OUT.
FIVE READS

Five reads, agreeing on 2 of 5 qualities.

Each quality placed on its ladder by each read, and the mean the engine keeps. Where reads differ, they differ by one rung; close calls resolve down.

READ 1READ 2READ 3READ 4READ 5MEAN
Form2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2BUILT2.0
Tonal depth2MODELLED2MODELLED2MODELLED1THIN2MODELLED1.8
Layering3ORDERED2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2LEGIBLE2.2
Composition2WORKING2WORKING3COMMANDING2WORKING2WORKING2.2
Material and surface2SOUND2SOUND2SOUND2SOUND2SOUND2.0

READ 1, IN ITS OWN WORDS

“Two opposed arc masses with clearly stepped translucent passes and a strong white diagonal channel, held back by bulky, nearly flat black cores and small creases. Ordered layering is its best quality; otherwise an ordinary, working sheet.”

Form · BUILT

Two arc-segment masses have coherent, holding walls following a curved sweep, but the black cores read as filled slabs; stepped joins lower left of the right mass are stiff.

WEAKEST Bulky black fan core with clumsy stepped notches, upper right

STRONGEST Outer arc band sweeping beneath the upper right mass

Tonal depth · MODELLED

Grey bands show grain and stepped density; black cores read almost flat in colour, with only faint variation when stretched. Modulation 0.054 sits just above the flat line.

WEAKEST Lower left black core, nearly flat inside

STRONGEST Grey arc bands with grain, lower right and lower left

Layering · ORDERED

Pale dry-brush, grey, darker grey and black passes step in clear order on both masses; overlaps at the right arc and lower left edge stay readable and build depth.

WEAKEST Opaque black cores conceal the passes beneath them

STRONGEST Stepped translucent bands around the upper right fan

Composition · WORKING

Opposed arcs imply one large circular sweep, with a shaped diagonal channel between them, but the black mass sits heavy and the top left paper does little work.

WEAKEST Heavy black upper right mass dominates; top left paper is passive

STRONGEST Diagonal white channel between the two opposing arcs

Material and surface · SOUND

Ink is controlled and edges bind cleanly; dry-brush is good but not form-shaping throughout. Small creases in the black and grey bands, plus faint cloudy wash low centre, remain minor.

WEAKEST Crease marks in the right of the black mass

STRONGEST Dry-brush drag in pale arcs, centre of sheet

FLAWS

4 distinct places, 0 major.

Each read must name every flaw and where it is, in a ninth of the sheet. Here the reads named flaws in 4 distinct places, 25 mentions in all across 5 reads; the number in each ninth is how many times a flaw was named there. Reads agreeing on a place strengthen the evidence for one flaw; they do not multiply it.

5 × OTHER“Dark crease lines in the grey band above the …”6 × OTHER, WATER STAIN“Dark crease streaks inside the black mass nea…”1 × WATER STAIN“Cloudy pale wash at the foot of the lower lef…”13 × OTHER, TIDE LINE, RING, WATER STAIN“Fine crease lines across the lower grey arc b…”WATER STAINRINGTIDE LINEOTHER
RULE 1Two tonal steps or fewer

Tonal depth held at rung 1.

3 steps: not applied
RULE 2A major flaw

Material held at rung 1. Mild waves in the unmounted paper are never a flaw.

none named
RULE 3Any quality below 0.5

The rating cannot exceed 4.

lowest 1.8
RULE 4At least two valid reads

A read that breaks the reply format is discarded.

5 of 5 valid
THE ARITHMETIC

V23 rating 6.0.

Engine v23.13, 5 reads. Fixed arithmetic, the same for every painting; the constants were set on a stratified sample of 24 paintings so the median sheet scores 5. The scale is relative to this archive, not to painting in general, and a difference of less than half a point between two paintings is noise.

MEAN RUNG2.04(2.0 + 1.8 + 2.2 + 2.2 + 2.0) ÷ 5
→
RAW5.081 + 2 × 2.04
→
RATING6.05 + 2.086 × (5.08 − 4.60)